This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Game Updates / The 2000 Pledge
« on: June 13, 2007, 07:02:04 pm »Three possible options:
ATR-42-500 (1995)
Saab 2000 (1995)
Antonov An-140 (1999) - Most likely given the release date.
What I could do is the same setup to AE where you select your aircraft from a limited number of options, such as the 3 above, and may be the ATR72 but you get reduced cash with the latter.
Yeah I think that would be good as I'd rather the ATR 42-500 over the An-140, but obviously some may prefer the An-140 over the ATR 42-500.
Bugs / Longest Route Too Long
« on: June 13, 2007, 05:13:08 pm »Game Updates / The 2000 Pledge
« on: June 13, 2007, 05:08:57 pm »Dash-8-300 most likely.
As it would be starting in 2000 as opposed to 1989, would it not make sense to provide a more modern default aircraft such as the ATR 42-500?
Game Updates / The 2000 Pledge
« on: June 12, 2007, 12:51:26 pm »General Chat / What aircraft can we look forward to in this round?
« on: May 06, 2007, 08:52:25 pm »1 question about the A330-300LR, is there really a LR version? thats the first time i have heard of it
Its not known as the A330-300LR, its known as the A330-300X, so the name used on AM was wrong.
Bugs / Unable to create Focus city
« on: April 21, 2007, 05:38:04 pm »Yes, but the fact that you stated that comment, to someone who was thanking us for our hard work, made me make that comment.
Well then you need your head checked. He dismissed my post as complaining, even though I was giving what was IMO constructive criticism, something you should be able to handle. Airline Mogul is great but needs serious improving to increase the realism, and if you're going to dismiss someone's criticism in favour of the 'good comments' then you're doing yourself nor AM no favours.
Bugs / Unable to create Focus city
« on: April 21, 2007, 12:51:37 am »Quote from: "d1-3508"If you don't like what people are saying (that we aren't on 24/7), then don't complain, or PM us.
NOTE TO ALL: If there are any complaints about us, PM us personally.
When did I ever mention this, let alone complain about it?
Here.
I don't think it would take much to allow airlines to create focus cities on continents other than the ones they're based on. If so fair enough, but regardless, would ye give up the lickarse replies and the smartarse comments as well, ye sound like an immature child, not to mention a do-gooder.
I still don't see where I complained about yous 'not being on 24/7' on Airline Mogul and having no life?
Bugs / Unable to create Focus city
« on: April 20, 2007, 05:30:56 pm »It will be (eventually) possible to have stopovers and one-way flights, but at the moment, they are both still under discussion. I don't see a single airline ANYWHERE in the world that operates domestic or international routes on two continents. If you can give me a reasonable example, then I will consider it.
I was referring to airlines making stopovers in Asian airports to fly to other onward airports in Asia and Australasia.
If you don't like what people are saying (that we aren't on 24/7), then don't complain, or PM us.
NOTE TO ALL: If there are any complaints about us, PM us personally.
When did I ever mention this, let alone complain about it?
Bugs / Unable to create Focus city
« on: April 19, 2007, 04:31:19 pm »can i also add that this game is also still in developement and not all things are up and running.
also the setup is realistic i dont see any european airline in the real world have an operational base outside of europe same goes with america asia middle east and so on yes airlines may fly LHR- SYDNEY but that takes more than a day to complete there and back. the 1 way setup isnt completed yet so instead of complaining about what you havnt got get on with using what you have.
i think the game creators have done a very good job even tho have have a life outside of mogul.
I don't think it would take much to allow airlines to create focus cities on continents other than the ones they're based on. If so fair enough, but regardless, would ye give up the lickarse replies and the smartarse comments as well, ye sound like an immature child, not to mention a do-gooder.