A340-300

OliAir · **Reply #15 on:** May 27, 2008, 04:35:18 am

Oh ok, I guess this would be the first time i've seen the formula way off then.

Seattle · **Reply #16 on:** May 27, 2008, 04:58:03 am

Quote from: "dktc"

Is the tiny bit with the MD-11 that important? We tend to use max seats max range fyi.

Pax for B767's should be reasonably close to real data... except JAWA claims one could squeeze 409 seats in -400ER, whiile we have 390 as pax. (And ofc, Seattle's source is dead wrong.)

How is my source dead wrong!? I was just trying to remeber of the top of my head! It was from AWS, were I later checked and found out that the -400 is larger than the -300, even though AWS uses the optimal seating (first, biz, economy) from Boeing.

dktc · **Reply #17 on:** May 27, 2008, 07:26:55 am

So you remember wrong... no need to get all defensive

Seattle · **Reply #18 on:** May 27, 2008, 08:20:45 am

Quote from: "dktc"

So you remember wrong... no need to get all defensive

yup

dktc · **Reply #19 on:** May 27, 2008, 08:22:18 am

kids these days

Seattle · **Reply #20 on:** May 27, 2008, 08:33:11 am

Quote from: "dktc"

kids these days

Well, its fun to be like that....

Mosha · **Reply #21 on:** June 01, 2008, 12:22:30 pm

A bit ot, but I have ever only done a couple of flights on an A340. I was tugging at the arm rests to try to lift it off the runway. :?

edidiot · **Reply #22 on:** June 01, 2008, 12:57:59 pm

Yeah they do have a disturbingly long take off roll don't they... but it's a lovely and quiet flight once your up compared to a 777