Post Multiworld Survey

hpscot08 · **on:** April 13, 2008, 08:08:38 pm

Please tell us your opinions of many of the new features we have implemented. We highly value your opinion.

http://www.eSurveysPro.com/Survey.aspx?id=bb5f8ba7-e30d-42ff-a9a3-58e10559939b

pseudoswede · **Reply #1 on:** April 13, 2008, 10:54:46 pm

Question #3 ... add "The Same Amount" as a choice.

Question #8 ... the answer choices are strange. Yes to what? No to what?

dktc · **Reply #2 on:** April 13, 2008, 10:59:41 pm

1 needs specification as in 1~10, which side is good, which is bad?

7 might need more elaboration.... as in take away what? :? the ease? the unrealistic side? the game play?... :?

9 needs elaboration as well... as in what the penalty is. I think most players are not aware of that.

StephenM · **Reply #3 on:** April 13, 2008, 11:43:00 pm

Quote from: "dktc"

1 needs specification as in 1~10, which side is good, which is bad?

I see it already says 1 is lowest and 10 is highest?

dktc · **Reply #4 on:** April 13, 2008, 11:44:42 pm

Quote from: "StephenM"

Quote from: "dktc"
1 needs specification as in 1~10, which side is good, which is bad?

I see it already says 1 is lowest and 10 is highest?

It does now :?

Cheung Airlines · **Reply #5 on:** April 14, 2008, 10:42:27 am

I just have two question
Q2 'Ease of Joining' what?
Q.9 Is Foreign Focus City allowed in W3? cos I have created one already.

SeaBlue Pacific Air · **Reply #6 on:** April 14, 2008, 12:18:15 pm

7. take away what?
8. choices should be something like:
- gate fees paid on date of purchase
- gate fees paid at the start of each month

I wanted to answer the survey but I can't finish # 7 and 8.

nwadeltaboy · **Reply #7 on:** April 28, 2008, 01:48:12 pm

for the micromanagement thing, it would probably be clearer if you said would it add to the game rather than detract from the game, because i almost voted the wrong choice. i dont remember which question it was, but it was about micromanaging.

yourefired · **Reply #8 on:** April 28, 2008, 02:23:01 pm

It would be awesome if we could micromanage on a macro level, if that makes any sense.

Meaning, micromanaging but not quite at the level of like, aviosim.

nwadeltaboy · **Reply #9 on:** April 28, 2008, 05:04:15 pm

Quote from: "yourefired"

It would be awesome if we could micromanage on a macro level, if that makes any sense.

Meaning, micromanaging but not quite at the level of like, aviosim.

Yes, such as mass staff layoffs. Now that's realistic!

:twisted:

yourefired · **Reply #10 on:** April 28, 2008, 06:27:17 pm

Okay...if only I actually did that...I have a dozen airplanes coming in the next 24 hours, I should be hiring pilots and cabin crew by the hundreds, not firing people.

Plus I don't lay people off, I just shift them into the mailroom. Or marketing. Or Research and Development.

nwadeltaboy · **Reply #11 on:** April 28, 2008, 10:25:23 pm

im joking.

i actually do think that the micromanagement thing would be a good idea.