What Plane Should I order!?

Seattle · **on:** February 26, 2008, 03:52:03 am

What is going to be the best choice a/c? In the 1950's, it was the 4-0-4 and 2-0-2.... what is it going to be this round?

dktc · **Reply #1 on:** February 26, 2008, 04:00:52 am

McDonnell Douglas MD-83 Executive Jet

(and before someone ask... it will appear in the database soon, but it isn't due until 1985

)

Seattle · **Reply #2 on:** February 26, 2008, 04:06:17 am

umm... why? Does it happen to slow growth?

dktc · **Reply #3 on:** February 26, 2008, 04:09:34 am

Quote from: "Seattle"

umm... why? Does it happen to slow growth?

hm...no. It has a long name, and stuff with long names should have high quality, right?

Seattle · **Reply #4 on:** February 26, 2008, 04:11:08 am

Quote from: "dktc"

Quote from: "Seattle"
umm... why? Does it happen to slow growth?

hm...no. It has a long name, and stuff with long names should have high quality, right?

mmmm....... nooo...... Singapore Airlines is short. It has very good quality.

dktc · **Reply #5 on:** February 26, 2008, 04:14:25 am

I said stuff with long names have high quality... not that
- stuff with short names have low quality, or that
- stuff with low quality have short names, or that
- stuff with high quality have long names.

So there is no fundermental conflict with SQ have short name and high quality.
[ie. A=>B does not mean B=>A, or (not A)=>(not B), or (not B) => (not A)]

Seattle · **Reply #6 on:** February 26, 2008, 04:17:41 am

Seattle International Airways (SLS) is a long name and it doesnt have good quality

Thanks_for_the_upgrade · **Reply #7 on:** February 26, 2008, 06:22:33 am

UnderwAir has lap dances in F.

Short name, bitchin quality.

iranair777 · **Reply #8 on:** February 26, 2008, 10:06:27 am

then I guess Iran Air doesnt have good quality

nwadeltaboy · **Reply #9 on:** February 26, 2008, 12:02:00 pm

AMTA has good quality

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

in the terrible department

StephenM · **Reply #10 on:** February 26, 2008, 01:16:02 pm

No posts in this topic actually contribute to the topic itself.