Airline Mogul Forum

Aircraft introduced in 1951 and 1952

Tanocapo · 26 · 5925
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2

Tanocapo

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
on: November 06, 2007, 07:24:27 am
Hi guys!!

well thats my question: which aircraft were introduced in 1951 and 1952? I know some aircraft but i lost track. I mean in the game, right?

TIA!! (Thanks in advance  :roll: )
img]http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i94/iecapici/Signatures/sig_Air_Condor_600x100.gif[/img]

Pacific

  • Airline Supervisor
  • **
    • Posts: 598
    • View Profile
Reply #1 on: November 06, 2007, 07:45:50 am

Air Elbonia

  • Administrator
  • Airline Senior Manager
  • *****
    • Posts: 2089
    • View Profile
Reply #2 on: November 06, 2007, 07:46:31 am
with the exception of the DC-3, all aircraft have an expected production period of 20 years.  So those expected to be withdrawn in 1970 where introduced in 1950, 1971 = 1951, 1972 = 1952.

-gets back to work on some life injected busywork with a fast approaching deadline. annoyances.-
Air Elbonia, First in Time Travel since 2073!  (AEB ID in Game: 333)

TerryWrist

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Reply #3 on: November 06, 2007, 04:11:06 pm
looks like nothing but junk


speed sucks, capacity sucks

the otter is useless because we can only land on land and not random locations we select with navigation coordinates (i.e. water based landings)
img]http://www.airlinemogul.com/airlinelogos/flyusyo.gif[/img]
Flying Cheap with Added Safety and Security!

Would John from Los Angeles please report to the Cathay Baggage Check....   :roll:
"so yesterday i flew with Cathay in a DC-3!"

dktc

  • Administrator
  • Airline Board Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 4622
    • View Profile
Reply #4 on: November 06, 2007, 04:28:01 pm
Quote from: "TerryWrist"
looks like nothing but junk


speed sucks, capacity sucks

the otter is useless because we can only land on land and not random locations we select with navigation coordinates (i.e. water based landings)


Your point? :roll:
D Express (id 616) 8)
AM Membership Officer / Official Broker

LOT 737-300

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 461
    • View Profile
Reply #5 on: November 06, 2007, 04:38:21 pm
Quote from: "TerryWrist"
looks like nothing but junk


speed sucks, capacity sucks

the otter is useless because we can only land on land and not random locations we select with navigation coordinates (i.e. water based landings)

1954/55 and 1957-1960 is what I am looking foward to. Next year looks good too. I guess not every year is great for buying a newly introduced plane.

Pilgrim

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Reply #6 on: November 06, 2007, 10:33:40 pm
Hey wait a minute... the 707 in 1954??? thats waaaay wrong? Should be end of 1957??? Only the prototype 367-80 was flying in 1954, and it was never designed or possible to use in passenger service?

And BTW, 707-020 is a 720.

Otherwise what good is the DC-7?

Pacific

  • Airline Supervisor
  • **
    • Posts: 598
    • View Profile
Reply #7 on: November 06, 2007, 10:48:07 pm
Pilgrim's correct here.  Also, Boeing 720 is not the first variant of the 707 that Boeing produced.  More like the third if I remember correctly.

Emirates

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
Reply #8 on: November 06, 2007, 11:02:33 pm
To Mecca we go!

Sorry..
W 1033 - China National Aviation Holding Company

dktc

  • Administrator
  • Airline Board Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 4622
    • View Profile
Reply #9 on: November 06, 2007, 11:07:09 pm
Quote from: "Pilgrim"
Hey wait a minute... the 707 in 1954??? thats waaaay wrong? Should be end of 1957??? Only the prototype 367-80 was flying in 1954, and it was never designed or possible to use in passenger service?

And BTW, 707-020 is a 720.

Otherwise what good is the DC-7?



To Air Elbonia, change it if you will. I don't care and I don't have time to care right now :cry:
btw, I know the 707-020 is later redesignated as 720... which I don't think we have on the list. (I could be wrong though).
D Express (id 616) 8)
AM Membership Officer / Official Broker

Armygrognard

  • Guest
Reply #10 on: November 08, 2007, 07:39:04 pm
Quote from: "dktc"
Quote from: "Pilgrim"
Hey wait a minute... the 707 in 1954??? thats waaaay wrong? Should be end of 1957??? Only the prototype 367-80 was flying in 1954, and it was never designed or possible to use in passenger service?

And BTW, 707-020 is a 720.

Otherwise what good is the DC-7?



To Air Elbonia, change it if you will. I don't care and I don't have time to care right now :cry:
btw, I know the 707-020 is later redesignated as 720... which I don't think we have on the list. (I could be wrong though).


You're too gloomy.  Try some Bawls or Jolt or something.

dktc

  • Administrator
  • Airline Board Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 4622
    • View Profile
Reply #11 on: November 08, 2007, 08:10:38 pm
Quote from: "Armygrognard"
You're too gloomy.  Try some Bawls or Jolt or something.


or maybe just out-source all my real-life work to you for free
D Express (id 616) 8)
AM Membership Officer / Official Broker

Pilgrim

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Reply #12 on: November 23, 2007, 02:39:47 am
well i guess no one care about fixing this...
 :cry:

dktc

  • Administrator
  • Airline Board Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 4622
    • View Profile
Reply #13 on: November 23, 2007, 03:18:54 am
Quote from: "Pilgrim"
well i guess no one care about fixing this...
 :cry:


Talk to Stephen or our new Aircraft Data Officer about it (if you could get hold of him).
I don't have the ower to change it.
D Express (id 616) 8)
AM Membership Officer / Official Broker

Jps

  • Airline Senior Manager
  • ****
    • Posts: 2772
    • View Profile
Reply #14 on: November 23, 2007, 09:12:14 am
Quote from: "dktc"
Quote from: "Pilgrim"
well i guess no one care about fixing this...
 :cry:


Talk to Stephen or our new Aircraft Data Officer about it (if you could get hold of him).
I don't have the ower to change it.


Who's the new Aircraft Data Officer then?

ID: 5000 ~ Flying Beyond The Stars

Pages: 1 2
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk