Airline Mogul Forum

737-400 Seating Error

deltafan

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
on: January 24, 2007, 12:18:47 pm
Has anyone else noticed that the 734 has 3 less seats than the 733? It's capacity says 146 when I should be in the 160s.
on Waite

Airline ID - 46


deltafan

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Reply #1 on: January 24, 2007, 12:59:02 pm
Also, A330-600, A320, Fokker F50, and Fokker F100 have no cost per hour.
on Waite

Airline ID - 46


Danny

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Reply #2 on: January 24, 2007, 01:10:31 pm
Quote from: "deltafan"
Also, A330-600, A320, Fokker F50, and Fokker F100 have no cost per hour.


No cost:
A300-600
A320-200
Fokker-50
Fokker-100
BaE146-300
BaE ATP

On the other hand:
A310 - all versions have way to high cost.
ww.airlinerphotos.prv.pl


SCA CEO

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 220
    • View Profile
Reply #3 on: January 24, 2007, 02:14:35 pm
I like it the way the A320's are, it should stay. :P
tar Cross Airlines ID:235 Fleet consists of 116 aircraft.

One of the few official brokers on AM!


Danny

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Reply #4 on: January 24, 2007, 02:45:25 pm
Actually they are too expensive. Even Airbus list price is lower, not talking about discounts that are so common in this industry.
ww.airlinerphotos.prv.pl


SCA CEO

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 220
    • View Profile
Reply #5 on: January 24, 2007, 02:46:28 pm
Shouldn't the 737-400 seating capacity be somewhere between 160 and 170?
tar Cross Airlines ID:235 Fleet consists of 116 aircraft.

One of the few official brokers on AM!


Danny

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Reply #6 on: January 24, 2007, 03:00:56 pm
Quote from: "SCA CEO"
Shouldn't the 737-400 seating capacity be somewhere between 160 and 170?


It should be 188 as the game uses maximum possible capacity not the typical one.
ww.airlinerphotos.prv.pl


StephenM

  • Administrator
  • Airline Board Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 6039
    • View Profile
Reply #7 on: January 24, 2007, 04:09:13 pm
Updated with 188 pax.
Stephen Murphy
Airline Mogul Chief Developer


Danny

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Reply #8 on: January 25, 2007, 12:56:36 am
Why would 400 burn less fuel than 300?
ww.airlinerphotos.prv.pl


StephenM

  • Administrator
  • Airline Board Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 6039
    • View Profile
Reply #9 on: January 25, 2007, 12:58:48 am
Quote from: "Danny"
Why would 400 burn less fuel than 300?


Less pax in the formula.
Stephen Murphy
Airline Mogul Chief Developer


Danny

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Reply #10 on: January 25, 2007, 12:59:39 am
So fuel burn depends on pax? I
ww.airlinerphotos.prv.pl


deltafan

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Reply #11 on: January 25, 2007, 02:23:46 am
Yeah, same fuel storage as 733, bigger plane, heavier plane, more people...all affect fuel performance and range. If I'm not mistaken, the -400 was fitted with slightly more updated engine compared to the -300 and was more fuel efficient overall, but sacrificed range for capacity.
on Waite

Airline ID - 46


StephenM

  • Administrator
  • Airline Board Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 6039
    • View Profile
Reply #12 on: January 25, 2007, 10:11:25 am
Quote from: "Danny"
So fuel burn depends on pax? I


Yes, I'm sure you'll find that a B747 will use more fuel per hour than a C152! Thats the first assumption, secondly older planes are not as economic as newer planes. Third assumption, turboprops are more economic than turbofans, finally 4 engines are not more economic than 2.

Note; these are all general statements and do not factor in the "quirks" that are there in real life.
Stephen Murphy
Airline Mogul Chief Developer


Danny

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Reply #13 on: January 25, 2007, 11:28:34 am
Sorry Steven but that is ridiculous. What is the point in upgading from Comet to A320 then? None :shock:
ww.airlinerphotos.prv.pl


 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk