Count to 10,000

[Air Nostrum]

Then... 2506 or 2507 
An answer ( or a clear explanation ) will be appreciate !!!

[1993matias]

2507

We began counting with 1, not with 0. That is why we should count as reply # plus one.

[Virgin Serbia]

2505!

It is just as valid an argument as yours

No, because if we are going to count right, we have to include the number 1. And the number 1 is counted in reply #0 - aka. the original post. ba4 distracted us, so reply #33 didn't call out a number, thus changing the count.

Actually, he who started it all should have begun at 0, making post number 1 number 1 and number 2 1 number more than number 1  Zero being the absolutely smallest number before negative (and we can't have negative posts) and therefore the starting number is zero

http://istartcountingatzero.com/

[davecummings]

2506

We should really do this with pictures for each number that way it's more of a challenge!

[Virgin Serbia]

2509

[1993matias]

Sooo... 2511?

[Virgin Serbia]

2511

[1993matias]

2513

[Virgin Serbia]

2513

[1993matias]

Stop repeating me!

2515

[Virgin Serbia]

2515

All your count are belong to me!

[1993matias]

2517

Not if I say them first!

[Virgin Serbia]

2517

The egg-less tosevite counts wrongly.

[1993matias]

2519

You're egg-less

[Virgin Serbia]

2519

Stop repeating after me, big ugly!