Should I add the Avro RJX series?

d1-3508 · **on:** May 02, 2007, 01:00:48 am

I want a quick opinion poll.

Should I add the Avro RJX series?

The RJX series would be:
RJX85 (only one model built)
RJX100 (only 2 models built)
and maybe even
RJX70 (offered, but not one frame built.)

dktc · **Reply #1 on:** May 02, 2007, 01:17:44 am

Sure... why not?

CornField · **Reply #2 on:** May 02, 2007, 02:12:30 am

Yes.... the unique variety of models, airports and (eventually) modes makes this game superior to other online airline games.

SQ748 · **Reply #3 on:** May 02, 2007, 02:34:13 am

anybody got the stats of those things?

d1-3508 · **Reply #4 on:** May 02, 2007, 02:41:24 am

Yep, I've got all the stats but the RJX70's range. (although I've nted it down as 1840nm)

dktc · **Reply #5 on:** May 02, 2007, 03:22:02 am

Quote from: "d1-3508"

Yep, I've got all the stats but the RJX70's range. (although I've nted it down as 1840nm)

Yes, there are conflicting data on the web... but this may worth consideration.
http://www.nationaljet.com.au/Charter/charter_146rj.html
Afterall, they fly it :wink: .

d1-3508 · **Reply #6 on:** May 02, 2007, 03:27:45 am

No, they don't.
We're talking the RJX here, not the RJ or the 146.
But, by the range diff. in the RJ70 to the RJ85, it works out to be about 60nm. So would 120nm difference be correct?

dktc · **Reply #7 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:13:20 am

Ooops... my bad :oops:

try this
http://www.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de/~pschirus/aviation/flugzeuge/bae146.phtml
it is in german though. the row "Max. Reichweite" is max range.

d1-3508 · **Reply #8 on:** May 02, 2007, 05:01:34 am

So that makes the ranges:
1875 (RJX100)
2048 (RJX85)
2186 (RJX70)

All of the above are in Nautical Miles.

StephenM · **Reply #9 on:** May 02, 2007, 06:18:20 am

It would be a good "What if" but we dont want to go into it too much otherwise we will have loads of planes being made up. If we can get a rule that the required data must be available for each aircraft type before its allowed to be entered. (That way failed initial designs shouldn't be in the game)

d1-3508 · **Reply #10 on:** May 02, 2007, 07:26:40 am

So, If all the major data (Name, Engines, NoE, Pax, etc.) is available, a model can be added?
And the fact that we have ACTUAL data for the RJX qualifies it for addition to the game.

StephenM · **Reply #11 on:** May 02, 2007, 09:27:39 am

Well the RJX was actually built, that also helps.

d1-3508 · **Reply #12 on:** May 02, 2007, 12:40:33 pm

One of the RJX85 & 2 of the RJX100's.
The question is, does the RJX70 (of which not one was produced) qualify?

StephenM · **Reply #13 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:55:16 pm

What does everyone else think?

Air Elbonia · **Reply #14 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:57:32 pm

none built + missing actual max range... no-go. -shrug- that's just me though.