A320-100 vs A320-200

TOMMY · **on:** June 29, 2008, 11:21:35 pm

Hi to all!
I've just seen on W#6 that the A320-100 have more range and less consumption than A320-200.
Airbus A320-100: Range=3524 Fuel=794

Airbus A320-200: Range=3305 Fuel=802.00

But, on Airlines.net is possible to read:
"The initial production version was the A320-100, which was built in only small numbers before being replaced by the definitive A320-200 (certificated in November 1988) with increased max takeoff weight, greater range and winglets"

Is an error or what else?

Byez to all:)
Tommy

Jacko-Smitha · **Reply #1 on:** June 30, 2008, 07:11:12 am

those few extra kms do count!

SkinnyRabbit · **Reply #2 on:** June 30, 2008, 09:11:02 am

Take into account the max speed of the plane.

zkvac · **Reply #3 on:** June 30, 2008, 09:58:37 am

It depends on what engine option you have (when ordering the plane, notice the drop-down for engines. Changing the engines may/will affect speed, range, fuel consumption, and price. I had 767-300ERs a couple of world's ago. In the main menu they looked average, but change the engines and they were a cheap 7000nm plane with perfect capacity.)

TOMMY · **Reply #4 on:** July 05, 2008, 07:01:22 pm

the A320-100 and 320-200 have only 1 type of engine

iranair777 · **Reply #5 on:** July 05, 2008, 10:17:34 pm

Quote from: "TOMMY"

the A320-100 and 320-200 have only 1 type of engine

IAE and CFM if I and you are corrected