Airline Mogul Forum

4th pilot in A300

lhenning

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 159
    • View Profile
on: June 16, 2008, 07:33:07 pm
Hi!

Just a question why is there a forth pilot in some of the A300 models?
CEO lhenning

A Star Alliance Member


Tiger In Training

  • Airline Supervisor
  • **
    • Posts: 500
    • View Profile
Reply #1 on: June 16, 2008, 08:42:44 pm
As thats how many pilots are recomended to pilot it by Airbus.


Fleur-de-Lis

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 199
    • View Profile
Reply #2 on: June 17, 2008, 07:30:52 pm
If you're worried about that, then don't acquire any Tupolev's or Ilyushin's.
;)
Asylum Freight

ID: 11045


Blue Sky Mine

  • Airline Manager
  • ***
    • Posts: 1093
    • View Profile
Reply #3 on: June 17, 2008, 10:33:28 pm
Quote from: "Fleur-de-Lis"
If you're worried about that, then don't acquire any Tupolev's or Ilyushin's.
;)


But Airbusses are no Tupolevs or Illushins :P
EO Blue Sky Mine (XAI), ID 2041

Mein Maserati fährt 210,
Schwupp, die Polizei hat´s nicht geseh´n,
das macht Spaß!
Ich geb Gas, ich geb Gas


karnc

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Reply #4 on: June 23, 2008, 03:52:00 am
PIC + F/O + S/O

I think that was requirement for A300.


Mosha

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 75
    • View Profile
Reply #5 on: June 23, 2008, 05:48:27 am
So when we get to 747-400 11 - 12 hour flights they should be double crewed.
Regards, Steve

Now no one can afford to fly


Dan380

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 191
    • View Profile
Reply #6 on: June 23, 2008, 12:44:35 pm
Now you're getting into complicated stuff. It would depend on route lengths and airlines preference too. For Instance a trans-atlantic flight in a 744 would likely have a 3 man crew (Cap F/O + S/O) but a flight at full range might have a 4 man crew. That could get complicated as the parameters are not set and are left at the disgretion of the airline.
img]http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6036/scandinaviair2smallsy1.jpg[/img]


zenmen5

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 369
  • I'm Baaack!
    • View Profile
Reply #7 on: June 28, 2008, 02:52:42 pm
I though  It was PIO+SPIO+NAV?
Id:14174

The new definition of crazy:
http://www.timecube.com/


Dan380

  • Airline Operative
  • *
    • Posts: 191
    • View Profile
Reply #8 on: June 28, 2008, 06:22:45 pm
The Naviagtor may be another name for the fight engineer. Although I thought the A300 was the first aircraft to go without them  :?
img]http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6036/scandinaviair2smallsy1.jpg[/img]


 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk