quote="yourefired"]Speaking of brokering, I just realized that if you broker a plane that takes 24 hours to build at 10%, you just financed it at 120% APR. Not even credit card companies are allowed to charge that kind of interest.
Now it's a different story when you broker a 747 at 10% (in which case you financed it at 12%-which is more reasonable) but still. That's a little, um, usurious.
Not that I dislike the practice.....it gets you into a plane faster, which is good, and you're basically leveraging someone else's money, which is also good. But um 120% APR...hmm.[/quote]
I'm not sure what you're driving at. The logic or the practice.
Let's say I have 4M cash and want to buy a 4M plane. Since I'm only fronting 35% plus a variable "brokerage fee" (let's say 5% for this example), I'm putting down 1.6M up front with 2.4M still left over, which I could then use to broker ANOTHER plane at the same time. If I have a little more cash I could even broker a THIRD plane at the same time.
Assuming they get picked up at the same time, I'm paying 600,000 for the benefit of getting three planes in the same time period as I would get one. Obviously the higher you offer your mark up too, the more likely it is to be accepted.
Secondly, if each of these planes can earn me a profit of 300,000 per day, those two extra planes I brokered already pay off that 600,000 brokerage mark up in one game day.
Whenever you buy a plane on 133% mark up or broker one at a mark up, you need to weigh the price overrun against the DOP that you are forbearing by NOT paying the mark up. Paying 15 million euro more for a plane, versus a 250k DOP (6 million MOP) is a bad idea, but if the DOP for the plane can be 1 million then it's a no brainer.