Topics

1

Game Data / Italy airports official data 2015

« on: April 28, 2016, 02:04:08 am »

Totali   Gennaio - Dicembre 2015 (su base 2014) - Dati aggiornati a Marzo 2016 N.   Airport   Movements   %   Passengers   %   Cargo (tons)   % 1   Alghero   12.551   -9,1   1.677.967   2,4   11,3   -70,8 2   Ancona   12.395   -2,9   521.065   8,4   6.723,9   -3,8 3   Bari   36.886   13   3.972.105   8   2.000   -3 4   Bergamo   76.078   12,4   10.404.625   18,6   121.045   -1,8 5   Bologna   64.571   -0,7   6.889.742   4,7   40.998,5   -1,9 6   Bolzano   11.915   -2,2   35.141   -46,4   0   n/a 7   Brescia   8.239   9,6   7.744   -42,8   29.903   -26,3 8   Brindisi   18.042   4,5   2.258.292   4,4   28   133,3 9   Cagliari   31.167   -8,6   3.719.289   2,2   3.253   8,5 10   Catania   54.988   -8,2   7.105.487   -2,7   6.220   0,2 11   Comiso   3.458   21,5   372.963   13,6   0   n/a 12   Cuneo   4.908   -14   129.847   -45,3   0   -100 13   Firenze   34.269   0,3   2.419.818   7,5   236,8   -11,9 14   Foggia   1.043   -57,7   1.942   -67   0   n/a 15   Genova   19.280   3,8   1.363.240   7,5   2.616,7   -24,9 16   Grosseto   1.661   -10   3.183   -32   0   n/a 17   Lamezia Terme   21.524   -5,9   2.342.452   -2,8   1.406   -3,7 18   Milano Linate   118.650   4,8   9.689.635   7,4   15.714   -10 19   Milano Malpensa (*)   160.484   -3,8   18.582.043   -1,4   511.191   8,8    (*) Inclusi movimenti e passeggeri Bergamo - si veda nota di commento 20   Napoli   60.261   1,4   6.163.188   3,4   10.727,5   7,8 21   Olbia   28.272   -1   2.240.016   5,3   246,6   -20,4 22   Palermo   42.407   0,4   4.910.791   7,4   1.186   -21,3 23   Parma   5.946   -15,2   187.028   -9   0   n/a 24   Perugia   5.963   72,6   274.027   30,9   0   n/a 25   Pescara   10.324   53,2   612.875   10,1   42   -4,5 26   Pisa   39.515   1,7   4.804.812   2,6   8.696,7   5,9 27   Reggio Calabria   6.858   -7,1   492.612   -5,8   52,9   15 28   Roma Ciampino (**)   53.153   6,2   5.834.201   16,1   15.756,5   0,6 29   Roma Fiumicino (**)   315.217   1   40.463.208   4,8   145.017,2   1,3    (**) Nel periodo Mag-Lug 2015, per ragioni operative, parte del traffico di FCO e' stato trasferito a CIA. 30   Torino   44.261   4,2   3.666.424   6,8   6.046,9   -14,1 31   Trapani   11.607   -7,4   1.586.992   -0,7      26,4   49,5 32   Trieste   14.672   -4,9   741.776         0,2      464,3   2,5 33   Treviso   18.402   3,4   2.383.307    6       0,1   -28,5 34   Venezia   81.946   5,4   8.751.028   3,3      50.961,1   14,7 35   Verona   27.374   -9   2.591.255   -6,6      4.953           8,2    TOTALI   1.458.287   1   157.200.120   4,5   985.524,5   3,6

Source: http://www.assaeroporti.com/statistiche_201512/

2

[-] Suggestions / [-] Simple suggestion to improve route editing

« on: July 04, 2011, 09:48:22 pm »

I experienced that editing a route can be painfully slow when you access from a slow connection (from a mobile phone, for example).

Could you implement a faster way to calculate the price, without having to manually write down numbers and press the "update results" button a lot of times?

For example, a system with up-down arrows that updates instantly the income result, without reloading the entire page?

Thanks, Neldot.

3

Game Data / 2010 traffic data for italian airports

« on: June 02, 2011, 05:52:20 pm »

Here they are, at the official site of Assaeroporti (italian airports managers association):

http://www.assaeroporti.it/ViewTotaliProg.asp?mese=12&anno=2010&lingua=en

A lot of small airports growing compared to 2009 data. And the growing trend continues in the first 2011 data.

4

Game Data / Breguet 763 Provence speed data

« on: September 13, 2010, 11:02:52 am »

I think that the Breguet 763 Provence speed data is incorrect. The game has 105 kn as speed of this plane, but the correct speed should be 205 kn.

Thank you.

5

[+] Suggestions / Initial expenses. An idea to decrease a bit the starting speed of the players

« on: September 12, 2010, 08:44:41 am »

It seems fair to me that the starting base should have a cost, deducted from the starting budget of the player.

This cost could be (at least) the monthly cost of the gates itself.

This rule, if implemented, would forbid players from starting in airports bigger than 200k (with an initial budget of 500k).
For example, if the starting base was a 250K airport, the initial money of the player should be reduced to 500.000-250.000x2 = 0 euro.  This way, players will be forced to choose mostly small/medium airports (50K/200K) to start with, otherwise they won't have enough money left to spend in gates acquirement.

Of course, the starting budget could be raised, for example, to 1.000.000 euro, so the players could choose a 350k airport as starting base, but at the cost of having only 300k money left to spend in gates (1.000.000-350.000x2=300.000).

I think that this rule would benefit the dynamics of the game, slowing down the initial economy, thus making the opening of a "big hub" as a target to reach, not a granted initial "gift".
Furthermore, that will reward the initial strategy of the player in choosing the base, whilst currently too many players simply choose a very big airport to have an initial advantage in route prices.

What do you think?