Print Page - 1st RESET EXECUTED, NEXT RESET JULY 8th}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Airline Mogul Forum
Airline Mogul => Private World Discussion & Invitation => Topic started by: Dobbins on June 08, 2011, 03:02:27 am
Title: 1st RESET EXECUTED, NEXT RESET JULY 8th}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Dobbins on June 08, 2011, 03:02:27 am
THE FIRST RESET WILL BE PERFORMED ON JUNE 28TH! MAKE SURE YOUR NUMBERS ARE UP. Since one of the rules is that no one will be reset within the first year, so there will be no reset on June 22nd.
I see a potential problem already. Whoever is Brussels Airlines, you need to get some routes going. We can't have someone in this game who just joins and then never does anything. It kind of ruins the point. If on June 28th there is anyone in the game with no PAX being carried, then they will be reset along with the next lowest person.
I have noticed a problem with the elimination system. I stated that no airline would be reset within the first twelve RW days, but airlines are joining late, which means they won't have the full year to grow. Here is the new plan. Any airline which joins will have 10-15 days depending on when they joined before they will be eligible to be reset. If an airline joins within three days of a reset, they will have 15 days (they will be immune from the next two), but if they join four days or more before a reset, they will only have immunity for that reset.
In other words, lets say ABC Air joins on June 29th. Since the next reset is July 2nd, and the one after that is July 8th, they will have immunity from both resets. If they join on June 28th, they will only have immunity for the July second reset.
That sounds confusing, but I am just trying to make it fair. Also, I have moved the first reset back to July 2nd, and all airlines that have already joined and any airlines which join between now and June 23rd will be eligible to be reset. This has been added to the OP.
Que the questions and complaints. RULES
Here is how this world will work:
THE AIRCRAFT OF CHOICE SO FAR IS THE BOEING 737-200 ADV. HGW. IF YOU DON'T LIKE THIS AIRCRAFT, PLEASE VOTE IN THE POLL TO CHANGE IT. THE POLL ENDS THURSDAY.
Anyone will be allowed in the world; there will be no password. This will be a full world and it will last 30 years, starting in 1980 and ending in 2010. There will be five starting aircraft (yet to be determined) and three starting gates, and each player will start with $2,500,000 in cash. Nine hubs, two of which can be foreign.
No one will be reset within the first year. This will allow airlines to get established. I will track the day everyone joins and each airline is reset. No one will be reset within one year of joining the game to help them get established. Anyone who is reset will also be allowed one year before being eligible to be reset again, unless their airline achieves a negative value within the first twelve months.
The worst performing airline will be reset every six months. All airline resets will be done using a formula which will divide total value by hub passengers. This will allow smaller airlines to compete, make it more difficult for larger airlines to build up and then do nothing, and allow startup airlines to have a fighting chance. Here are two examples of the formula:
Airline ABC has hubs at Atlanta (46 million), London Heathrow (66 million), and Tokyo Haneda (64 million), or a total of 176 million passengers. Total value of airline ABC is $10,000,000,000. 10 billion divided by 176 million works out to about $56.82 per passenger.
Airline XYZ has one hub at Cape Town (8 million), so 8 million passengers. Airline XYZ has a total value of $500,000,000. 500 million divided by 8 million is about $62.50 per passenger.
Based on these two airlines, airline ABC would actually be eliminated, as they are financially the weaker airline.
All airlines which have a negative value will also be reset.
Please feel free to chime in with suggestions, and please vote on the aircraft in the aircraft poll.
List of Airlines I will be maintaining the list of players here. I will post when each airlines is created and where they are at, and when each airline is reset.
July 2nd-AsiaAir reset, hubs in Beijing
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: gopats1479 on June 08, 2011, 03:32:40 am
That would be very interesting. I'm game.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 08, 2011, 04:07:35 am
Hey, this sounds very interesting!!! I would love it if you did this!
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 08, 2011, 05:35:17 am
theOoh! I think I just figured out the tokens dilemma. Rather than bout the user, I'll just rest them. This way it keeps the numbers and the competition up but it won't require constantly spending tokens to rejoin.
This could be big.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: 1993matias on June 08, 2011, 07:46:48 am
If we get many to join, I'd like to join. I would very much like to replay the old times of crowded worlds!
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: AirbusL1011 on June 08, 2011, 08:22:11 am
i'll join!i hope i dont get owned :(
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 08, 2011, 08:17:16 pm
Here are my thoughts so far.
A thirty year world will last 360 days in the real world, so a year.
Hubs would be limited to 9 domestic and 2 foreign (This would allow for five domestic and two foreign hubs, which is very similar to United having a base in Tokyo and still have extensive operations throughout Europe with it's codeshare partners, or it would also allow an airline such as Southwest or Ryan Air to dominate one continent).
Every 6 months, I delete the worst performing airline. In order to give start up a chance, no airline will be reset until it is at least 15 months old.
As much as I would like to promise that I could log on at a certain time every six days to reset the losing airline, I can't. I have a job, a social life, etc. Therefore the deletion may be done early in the morning, it may be done late at night. This also adds a touch of realism/keeps you on your toes (I.E. no airline is scheduled to go out of business at 8:00pm on October 2nd in the real world, so why would it happen in the game world).
All resets will be done based solely on airline value, so it won't matter how much cash you have in the bank or how many planes are in your fleet.
Starting year would be 1980, and each player would receive 3 gates, $1,000,000 and 5 planes. Planes would would be something along the lines of an Airbus 319 (Skybus Airlines, which was a startup airline hubbed out of Columbus, Ohio a few years ago, started with a similar number of gates and planes).
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Mastafa on June 08, 2011, 09:50:39 pm
In real life, don't airlines start up with 1 plane?
I think it is a 737-800, but I am not sure :-X
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: 1993matias on June 08, 2011, 09:51:07 pm
May I suggest not using a mainstream aircraft as starting aircraft? Because then all airlines will stick with Airbus/Boeing, and not so much diversity will be in the game. I it is in the 80's, can I suggest the Dassault Mercure?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 08, 2011, 10:26:38 pm
In real life, don't airlines start up with 1 plane?
Skybus Airlines started with 7 Airbus 319s in 2007. Southwest started with 3 Boeing 737s in 1970. I think anymore Airlines are such a big venture that they have to have several aircraft so that they can quickly get established.
As for the actual starting aircraft, I am open to suggestions.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: secretformula on June 08, 2011, 10:51:03 pm
Im in too. Is this going to be realistic in terms have multi routes?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 08, 2011, 11:41:03 pm
What do you mean by multi routes? do you mean like the realistic scheduling world? If thats what you mean, then no, there will be nothing like that in this world.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 09, 2011, 12:16:45 am
How about, since its 1980, 3 gates and 7 ATR-74s? Otherwise, stick with 5 A319s. with either of thos aircraft and numbers I have mentioned, you will get a lot more people to join! I'm thinking in terms of appeal to other people here
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 09, 2011, 01:38:23 am
You can't give more than five starting aircraft when you begin a world, but I would be open to using ATR-74s.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Mastafa on June 09, 2011, 01:38:56 am
How about, since its 1980, 3 gates and 7 ATR-74s? Otherwise, stick with 5 A319s. with either of thos aircraft and numbers I have mentioned, you will get a lot more people to join! I'm thinking in terms of appeal to other people here
You can give a max. of 5 aircraft.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Mastafa on June 09, 2011, 01:39:36 am
Woah... I think we both posted at the same time :P
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 09, 2011, 01:44:30 am
Upon further research, neither the ATR-74 or the Airbus 319 is available in 1980. The Boeing 737 is. I am opened to suggestions for aircraft and a starting date for this world.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 09, 2011, 01:46:12 am
Woah... I think we both posted at the same time :P
Clearly I was first. And don't you forget it.
8) :D
:lol:
Get back on topic though!
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: GPWestjet on June 09, 2011, 02:11:20 am
I would be interested in joining this world.
My suggestion is that we use the Boeing 737 or maby a smaller aircraft if possible.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: secretformula on June 09, 2011, 02:37:33 am
Ok I defiantly in if there is no 2x or more routes! Let me know when you get this started up! :)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: GQfluffy on June 09, 2011, 02:50:57 am
The 737-200 Advanced is a great aircraft for the 80's; fast, decent amount of pax, decent turn around times, and the range is surprisingly good. Fuel burn kinda sucks...
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Mastafa on June 09, 2011, 03:13:41 am
The 737-200 Advanced is a great aircraft for the 80's; fast, decent amount of pax, decent turn around times, and the range is surprisingly good. Fuel burn kinda sucks...
Fuel monsters :roll:
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: gopats1479 on June 09, 2011, 03:22:25 am
My suggestion is the Douglas DC-9-50. It has a good capacity and the range is decent but not over 2300nm. The fuel burn is slightly higher than the B732HGW, but the seat count is higher so it's an even trade.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: nathanaelmt on June 09, 2011, 03:23:40 am
I'd like to join this one. Very interesting
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 09, 2011, 04:34:00 am
My suggestion is the Douglas DC-9-50. It has a good capacity and the range is decent but not over 2300nm. The fuel burn is slightly higher than the B732HGW, but the seat count is higher so it's an even trade.
Hmm. I like it. A very appropriate aircraft for the time.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 09, 2011, 05:20:12 am
Lol sorry for not doing the research on thoughs a/c for you. And not knowing that we can only start with 5. I would still like to join this world. Sounds very interesting!
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: 1993matias on June 09, 2011, 07:35:59 am
I may or may not join, depending on my mood when the world opens :P
But may I suggest a non-mainstream aircraft - such as Dassault Mercure - so everybody doesn't fly around with Boeing, and only Boeing? That would make it a bit more realistic. This would also make the aircraft market a bit more varied. Try reducing the amount of aircraft a bit, so we don't get a running start, make it a bit harder ;)
I may or may not join, depending on my mood when the world opens :P
At this point I am planning on having a couple hundred slots and no password, so you can join whenever you want.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Mporcel on June 09, 2011, 07:46:21 pm
I like the idea very much! I would like to suggest studying the possibility of code share agreement not only alliances. The difference would be that in a code share agreement you will not be able to start routes from other bases but you will benefit in two ways: passengers flying from or to your origin point. For example if carrier A flies from North America to Europe, then carrier B can take those passengers throughout its european/middle east/asian network. The revenues can be shared or there can be a fixed monthly fee.
Also, when joining an alliance, airlines shouldn´t be able to compete on existing routes. The idea is to open up new routes to new destinations.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 09, 2011, 08:49:54 pm
That sounds great, but you realize that I am not an Airline Mogul Staff member and can't initiate anything like that?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: gopats1479 on June 09, 2011, 10:10:33 pm
I may or may not join, depending on my mood when the world opens :P
But may I suggest a non-mainstream aircraft - such as Dassault Mercure - so everybody doesn't fly around with Boeing, and only Boeing? That would make it a bit more realistic. This would also make the aircraft market a bit more varied. Try reducing the amount of aircraft a bit, so we don't get a running start, make it a bit harder ;)
OMG the bristol PULLMAN has more range then that thing!
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: AirbusGuy350 on June 09, 2011, 11:21:03 pm
It can work we can have an Alliance so now we need a North American airline an Asian airline, South American, African, and European.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: secretformula on June 09, 2011, 11:23:01 pm
I got North America if you wouldn't mind :)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 09, 2011, 11:29:31 pm
Damm... Looks like someone beat me to it haha but Airbusguy350 I guess its up to you on which one of us who want it actually take North America. Otherwise I will go off and do my own thing in this world... Still in North America tho
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: secretformula on June 09, 2011, 11:31:47 pm
Trollways FTW! I look forward to friendly competing with you sir :)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 09, 2011, 11:36:09 pm
Yes, I love good competition in worlds like this! Looking Forward to it! :)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 10, 2011, 12:34:06 am
I will be based out of Europe for this one. I'm not sure which airport yet, but it will either be London, Paris, or Amsterdam. I'll be going for a legacy carrier, but I would totally be up for an alliance.
Also, with so much discussion for planes, I have come to a conclusion. I am going to create a poll. I will list plane listed so far, as well as any others which are nominated. We can all vote on with which plane we will start.
I do have to ask why so many peoplee want to start this world with small or obscure planes. First off, not many airlines start with a DHC-200 and grow from there in the real world, and second, starting with smaller planes will really discourage anyone who starts late or gets reset from playing. This is why I really like the Boeing 737s or Douglas DC-9s. Like I said though, make suggestions and I'll create a poll this weekend.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 10, 2011, 12:38:36 am
Since I will not be a part of Airbusguys alliance, I have actually founded one in another world called SkyConnect while ago and if anyone is interested, I will happily start it up again in this world. :) You're thoughts, anyone who would like to join? We'll talk strategy once we know where everyone plans on basing
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 10, 2011, 12:42:41 am
I'd like a spot in that alliance, if you don't mind.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: gopats1479 on June 10, 2011, 12:49:49 am
I'll be in Airbus's alliance.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 10, 2011, 01:17:58 am
Ok so so far, Dobbins wants in... if we could get 3 or 4 more people... that would be nice... :)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: BINDU on June 10, 2011, 01:43:31 am
Hmm. I see one sort of problem with this; it penalizes carriers with small home bases. For example, Ethiopian airlines is more likely to stay in business right now than Frontier, but in AM Frontier would have the larger value. Therefore I think that there should be some sort of better way of doing this. I'm thinking that maybe we could exclude Africa from this valuation limitation. Or, do a sort of value in relation to the combined size of the bases (ie if a carrier has bases in Atlanta and Tulsa, their airline would have 89+3=92 million combined size of base)
Then divide their value by the pax size of bases to determine a score. The airlines with the lowest scores would then be deleted.
Anyhow, I'd like to join as a US based carrier as well.
Plan to simulate United Airlines with the following hubs
ORD (base) LAX DEN SFO IAH EWR IAD CLE SEA
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 10, 2011, 02:11:49 am
Bindu, Would you like to be part of the alliance that I am currently forming. lol
I plan to use the following bases (edited to work around yours)
ATL (base) BOS DFW MSP PDX PHX LAX MCO and just because I know no one hubs here usually, LAS
And then all we would need is a European airline and an Asian airline (Preferably two)
Also on the list as usefull but not necessary, a South American airline
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: BINDU on June 10, 2011, 03:23:50 am
Do you want to share LAX with me. We both can operate there, but if you really want it for yourself, I'll switch off LAX and SEA, and open a GUM hub for myself.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: BINDU on June 10, 2011, 03:24:29 am
Oh East West, have you abandoned Realistic World 2.0?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 10, 2011, 05:15:40 am
Not Exactly, Im just done expanding I guess... Never wanted to go legacy in that world
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 10, 2011, 05:18:48 am
I think we can share LAX, it would be the one place where both airlines kinda set up shop and dominate ya know?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: 1993matias on June 10, 2011, 06:11:49 am
Hmmm, it looks like I would like to be a South American this time. No objections? Okay, I'm going to be out of Sao Paulo :)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 10, 2011, 06:32:39 am
I have decided to Hub out of London Heathrow, and my airline will probably be Royal Atlantic.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 10, 2011, 07:10:25 am
1933matias Would you care to join our alliance? :P
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: 1993matias on June 10, 2011, 07:16:07 am
Hehe, yes, why not?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: gopats1479 on June 10, 2011, 12:58:40 pm
Bindu, that is a big problem. I definitely think that that formula (value divided by real world hub pax) is the best way to score each airline. I'll even do the math for it :P I've changed my mind. I'll join EastWest's alliance. It just seems like it would be better for me at this point. I've also come up with a new hub arrangement: PEK HND HKG SIN BOM DUB SYD I'm starting to like these cities that are their own country ;)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: gopats1479 on June 10, 2011, 01:25:02 pm
I got some results for the formula. The test subjects are AsiaAir, Central American Airways, and Delte Airlines from Realistic 2.0. AsiaAir -Bases: PEK, HND, BKK -Total real world base pax: 169,161,885 -Total value:4,225,925,456 -Total score: about 25
Central American Airways -Bases: MEX, CUN -Total real world base pax: 38,856,668 -Total value: 1,902,190,621 -Total score: about 49
Delte Airlines -Bases: ATL, DFW, DTW, MSP, JFK, SLC -Total real world base pax: 264,643,106 -Total value: 58,505,982,030 -Total score: about 221 Based on these tests, AsiaAir would be knocked out. Keep in mind that I didn't use the smallest airlines in the world but a wide diversity: a large Asian carrier, a smaller Central American carrier, and the supergiant. I think the formula needs to change or we just select the lowest airlines. It's a good solution to use the formula, but it has some really huge problems. Does anyone disagree? Bindu and 1993matias, I hope you don't mind me using your airlines to test this.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 10, 2011, 03:25:00 pm
So who all is in the Alliance so far and where are they flying?
Eastwest-Europe Mathias-South America EastWest-North America GoPats-Asia/Australia
Does anyone dare try Africa in this world?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 10, 2011, 03:27:35 pm
I like that formula. Let me think about it and I'll repost later today. I am going to try and the final rules set for this world this afternoon and I'll post them, along with the poll for the aircraft.
When can everyone join? I'll need to purchase some tokens to create this world, so I am no in a huge rush to do it, but I would like to get started sooner than later.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: AirbusGuy350 on June 10, 2011, 03:41:53 pm
i can join asap
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: 1993matias on June 10, 2011, 05:39:03 pm
I am able to start when Realistic World v2 comes to an end. There's 2y 11 months left. In 1½ year (18 rl days)?
If I hadn't played an African airline a short while ago, I would have given it a shot :) But else I'm thinking Iceland - but I'm going to stick with SA.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 10, 2011, 07:02:09 pm
No, No, I like having someone from South America in the Alliance. Really I think South America as a whole may be the most underrated continent in the game, perhaps Asia as well.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 10, 2011, 11:37:19 pm
So who all is in the Alliance so far and where are they flying?
Eastwest-Europe Mathias-South America EastWest-North America GoPats-Asia/Australia
Does anyone dare try Africa in this world?
You put me on there twice? :P :P I thought you were going to be providing the Europe aspect of this alliance...
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 10, 2011, 11:48:59 pm
I was and I am. That was supposed to be my own name for Europe. Leave it to me to mess up my own name. Let me try that again.
Dobbins: Europe Bindu: North America EastWest: North America Mathias: South America GoPats: Asia/Australia
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: BINDU on June 11, 2011, 12:15:06 am
what about me?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 11, 2011, 12:36:08 am
Bindu, you have been added. One of these days I'll actually get it right.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 11, 2011, 01:53:20 am
The poll for the aircraft has been started and the rules for the world have been posted on the OP. Please vote. We will start the world on June 19th, just because that is my birthday, and the first reset will take place on July 2nd or 3rd.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 11, 2011, 02:13:27 am
Dobbins: Europe Bindu: North America EastWest: North America Mathias: South America GoPats: Asia/Australia
Alright so seeing as I am the founder of this alliance, I am going to go ahead and put the idea out there that we will no longer be accepting any more North American carriers because with the combine bases of Bindu and I, we will pretty much have the area covered. The only exception to this would be if someone wanted to operate all Canadian hubs and use their 2 International hubs in mexico...
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: gopats1479 on June 11, 2011, 04:10:08 am
I can join whenever. I almost have enough tokens to join two worlds. And Dobbins, I totally agree with Asia being underrated. In the worlds that I've been in, most people will make a huge airline in Europe or NA and have one foreign base in Asia. It's really quite sad :(
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: GPWestjet on June 11, 2011, 04:16:20 am
Dobbins: Europe Bindu: North America EastWest: North America Mathias: South America GoPats: Asia/Australia
Alright so seeing as I am the founder of this alliance, I am going to go ahead and put the idea out there that we will no longer be accepting any more North American carriers because with the combine bases of Bindu and I, we will pretty much have the area covered. The only exception to this would be if someone wanted to operate all Canadian hubs and use their 2 International hubs in mexico...
I would be interested in joining to be an airline in Canada. But would like to have those 2 international hubs somewhere else.(Not U.S.)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 11, 2011, 04:53:33 am
Dobbins: Europe Bindu: North America EastWest: North America Mathias: South America GoPats: Asia/Australia
Alright so seeing as I am the founder of this alliance, I am going to go ahead and put the idea out there that we will no longer be accepting any more North American carriers because with the combine bases of Bindu and I, we will pretty much have the area covered. The only exception to this would be if someone wanted to operate all Canadian hubs and use their 2 International hubs in mexico...
I would be interested in joining to be an airline in Canada. But would like to have those 2 international hubs somewhere else.(Not U.S.)
I would completely agree with shutting that Alliance down to any more North American members once GPWestJet joins.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 11, 2011, 05:04:01 am
At this point I am going to be using the following airports for hubs:
London Heathrow (LHR) Paris Charles De Gaulle (CDG) Frankfurt (FRA) Amsterdam Shipol (AMS) Madrid (MAD)
I was planning on using one of my international hubs in Asia and one in North America, but given how thoroughly North America seems to be covered in the Alliance, I may open two more domestic hubs or have a second international hub in Asia or the Middle East.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: GQfluffy on June 11, 2011, 06:33:16 am
Sounds like an awesome world...but I think I may end up passing. Got quite a bit to do in July in preparation for getting married in August.
Besides, gopats wouldn't want to share HND with me again. ;) I think he didn't appreciate the de-icing glycol hand soap prank we pulled in his concourse.
All joking aside, I'll be keeping an eye on the world. If possible, I may join up after mid-August finally rolls around...if the wife lets me. :(
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 11, 2011, 06:52:16 am
It will be an open world with plenty of slots. People joining lase help to fulfill that realistic operations portion of the world, anyway.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: East West Airlines on June 11, 2011, 07:17:32 am
Right so, GPWestjet has the canadian slot on lock. Also, Dobbins how many hubs can we have? you said 9 right?
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: 1993matias on June 11, 2011, 09:48:41 am
I won't join until July, but I'm still in!
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: gopats1479 on June 11, 2011, 12:17:30 pm
I was planning on using one of my international hubs in Asia and one in North America, but given how thoroughly North America seems to be covered in the Alliance, I may open two more domestic hubs or have a second international hub in Asia or the Middle East.
Just please don't hub in one of my airports. That basically excludes anything large except Shanghai and Narita.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: AirbusL1011 on June 11, 2011, 01:38:14 pm
phew, AU is all for me! :D
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: BINDU on June 11, 2011, 02:34:47 pm
Sounds like an awesome world...but I think I may end up passing. Got quite a bit to do in July in preparation for getting married in August.
Besides, gopats wouldn't want to share HND with me again. ;) I think he didn't appreciate the de-icing glycol hand soap prank we pulled in his concourse.
All joking aside, I'll be keeping an eye on the world. If possible, I may join up after mid-August finally rolls around...if the wife lets me. :(
Congratulations!!
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 11, 2011, 03:23:14 pm
Right so, GPWestjet has the canadian slot on lock. Also, Dobbins how many hubs can we have? you said 9 right?
Yes, nine, and I've update the OP to reflect this. This allows for a truly dominated domestic or regional carrier to do quite well, yet also allows for a legacy to be quite established as well (5 domestic hubs, two foreign, or 7 and 1).
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: secretformula on June 12, 2011, 03:18:19 am
I can join ASAP also
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: AirbusL1011 on June 12, 2011, 04:31:15 am
i'll join first chance i get :D
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: jayceon on June 13, 2011, 04:45:29 pm
I'd like to join this. Sounds pretty good to me. Is it started yet? If so, what's its number :)
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 13, 2011, 08:12:09 pm
It has not started, it will start later this week. I'll update the thread title once it begins.
Title: Re: Ultra Competitive World / Quasi realistic operations world.
Post by: Dobbins on June 13, 2011, 11:31:35 pm
I was planning on using one of my international hubs in Asia and one in North America, but given how thoroughly North America seems to be covered in the Alliance, I may open two more domestic hubs or have a second international hub in Asia or the Middle East.
Just please don't hub in one of my airports. That basically excludes anything large except Shanghai and Narita.
I would be very happy with Shanghai, and my other hub will probably be Dubai. It'll be a while before I expand, though, since the formula for elimination actually prevents quick expansion, or at least makes it very tough to do.
Title: Re: STARTS THURS JUNE 16-RULES POSTED}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 14, 2011, 12:37:00 am
I have been thinking, as I mentioned above, that whoever opens hubs the fastest will probably be at the biggest disadvantage, so I am going to start discussing strategy just for fun.
My first hub will be at London Heathrow, and I am going to start shorter service at first to only the Largest European Airports. As those routes receive competition, I'll start flying to the US and Asia once I have some more aircraft, and then slowly open hubs. Better off doing a ton of routes from one hub than a few routes from several hubs.
Title: Re: STARTS THURS JUNE 16-RULES POSTED}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: East West Airlines on June 14, 2011, 01:33:05 am
I have been thinking, as I mentioned above, that whoever opens hubs the fastest will probably be at the biggest disadvantage, so I am going to start discussing strategy just for fun.
My first hub will be at London Heathrow, and I am going to start shorter service at first to only the Largest European Airports. As those routes receive competition, I'll start flying to the US and Asia once I have some more aircraft, and then slowly open hubs. Better off doing a ton of routes from one hub than a few routes from several hubs.
I agree 100%... I like to really milk one hub for all its got before moving on. I rent a ton of gates, then I build up a fleet of 50 unused aircraft and open up another hub and fly to all the destinations of the first hub plus more. I repeat this process several times and then start doing long haul. This usually takes quite a bit of game years but with a 30 year world like this, it seems like the best strategy
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: BINDU on June 17, 2011, 01:23:03 am
Gonna hub in GUM instead of CLE+SEA
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops w
Post by: East West Airlines on June 17, 2011, 05:37:28 am
WHO IS DELTA AIRLINES AND WHY ARE THEY IN MY HUB!? DO THEY REALIZE NOT ONLY IS IT ILLEGAL TO HAVE DELA AIRLINES AS A NAME BUT ALSO THAT THEY ARE IN MY HUB. Dobbins please, this is a pretty good reason to get them out of here. Not that I care about the whole hub thing because I could switch it up and go LAX but having the name Delta is illegal.
Thank you
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops w
Post by: East West Airlines on June 17, 2011, 07:22:10 am
Wooooowww... Ok seriously, If I'd known there were gonna be 3 airlines based in Atlanta before this world even started, I would have based somewhere else... do what you want, I'm about to own you all! Let the competition begin! Safe flying!
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops w
Post by: AirbusGuy350 on June 17, 2011, 05:43:48 pm
Now that we have started I did the math to see what the scores would be like and I actually like the scoring system a lot (not just because I am in first :P) It really makes being at a large airport not an automatic win which is nice for a change.
CaribbeanBlue 34.44 Brussels Airlines 15.25 British European Airlines 15.07 Australia Blue 11.79 Anandha Airlines 8.98 Locust Air 5.29 Jetway International 4.89 UniteContinental 4.55 Royal Atlantic Airways 4.28 LinkAir 3.35 Western Connection 3.34 Delta Airline 3.32
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 17, 2011, 11:30:37 pm
If you are that upset, send your concern to stephenm, and if I hear from him, I'll bounce them.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Indian Ocean Airlines on June 18, 2011, 12:25:09 am
I'm going to join this world and will start off based at SEZ.
Planning on having hubs at: SEZ JNB SSH MRU (May change to CPT or DUR) CMN CMB PER
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops w
Post by: East West Airlines on June 18, 2011, 01:39:28 am
WHO IS DELTA AIRLINES AND WHY ARE THEY IN MY HUB!? DO THEY REALIZE NOT ONLY IS IT ILLEGAL TO HAVE DELA AIRLINES AS A NAME BUT ALSO THAT THEY ARE IN MY HUB. Dobbins please, this is a pretty good reason to get them out of here. Not that I care about the whole hub thing because I could switch it up and go LAX but having the name Delta is illegal.
Now that we have started I did the math to see what the scores would be like and I actually like the scoring system a lot (not just because I am in first :P) It really makes being at a large airport not an automatic win which is nice for a change.
CaribbeanBlue 34.44 Brussels Airlines 15.25 British European Airlines 15.07 Australia Blue 11.79 Anandha Airlines 8.98 Locust Air 5.29 Jetway International 4.89 UniteContinental 4.55 Royal Atlantic Airways 4.28 LinkAir 3.35 Western Connection 3.34 Delta Airline 3.32
and im near the TOP!!!! HOORAY!!!
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: jayceon on June 18, 2011, 12:33:36 pm
Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik Avialinii coming through :lol:
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN!}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 18, 2011, 03:23:24 pm
THE FIRST RESET WILL BE PERFORMED ON JUNE 28TH! MAKE SURE YOUR NUMBERS ARE UP. Since one of the rules is that no one will be reset within the first year, so there will be no reset on June 22nd.
I see a potential problem already. Whoever is Brussels Airlines, you need to get some routes going. We can't have someone in this game who just joins and then never does anything. It kind of ruins the point. If on June 28th there is anyone in the game with no PAX being carried, then they will be reset along with the next lowest person.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: East West Airlines on June 18, 2011, 08:08:56 pm
I hae just created the SkyConnect alliance as I said I was going to, If you previously showed interest in joining (Dobbins, Bindu, GPwestjet, and matias I think were the ones) feel free to join at any time.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 18, 2011, 10:26:40 pm
Eastwest, I have applied, please vote on my application. Thanks!
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 19, 2011, 01:39:41 am
Thank you!
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 19, 2011, 02:23:39 am
Updated standings just for fun:
Indian Ocean Seychelles 787.182 CaribbeanBlue San Juan 36.424 British European Manchester 17.132 Brussels (No Flights) Brussels 14.937 Sotsialist#$%#$@%& Moscow Domodedovo 14.258 Australia Blue Melbourne 12.061 Anandha Jakarta 7.723 Locust Dallas Fort Worth 6.211 UniteContinental Chicago O'hare 5.831 Jetaway International Paris Charles De Gaulle 5.735 Royal Atlantic London Heathrow 5.201 Western Connection Atlanta 4.222 Delta Atlanta 4.086 LinkAir Atlanta 3.659
I was wondering if anyone was going to try and hub at a po-dunk little airport like Minot. Looks like Seychelles won out. Not a bad stradegy at first, but it definitely limits airline value growth. The playing field should level for the bigger guys, given time.
Good luck to the three of you in Atlanta, your going to need it.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: East West Airlines on June 19, 2011, 03:20:32 am
Good luck to the three of you in Atlanta, your going to need it.
This is so ridiculous... If I'd known 3 people were going to hub in Atlanta right off the bat I would have switched it up and hubbed in Orlando, or Minneapolis... in this scenario I think it will be wise to fly to a lot of those smaller airports... Best of luck to everyone!
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 19, 2011, 04:20:06 am
I can reset you now if you would like to change hubs. The world is only a couple of days in. Also, should you lose a round and be reset, send me a message if you want to change hubs. In all seriousness, though, it looks like you are doing just fine. You're the top airline in Atlanta and it really doesn't look like you are at any risk of losing anytime soon.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: East West Airlines on June 19, 2011, 04:25:25 am
Yeah, I think it's going to be fine, and Competition makes this game more interesting than it already is.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: AirbusL1011 on June 19, 2011, 08:48:10 am
Indian Ocean Seychelles 787.182 CaribbeanBlue San Juan 36.424 British European Manchester 17.132 Brussels (No Flights) Brussels 14.937 Sotsialist#$%#$@%& Moscow Domodedovo 14.258 Australia Blue Melbourne 12.061 Anandha Jakarta 7.723 Locust Dallas Fort Worth 6.211 UniteContinental Chicago O'hare 5.831 Jetaway International Paris Charles De Gaulle 5.735 Royal Atlantic London Heathrow 5.201 Western Connection Atlanta 4.222 Delta Atlanta 4.086 LinkAir Atlanta 3.659
I was wondering if anyone was going to try and hub at a po-dunk little airport like Minot. Looks like Seychelles won out. Not a bad stradegy at first, but it definitely limits airline value growth. The playing field should level for the bigger guys, given time.
Good luck to the three of you in Atlanta, your going to need it.
ooh- the three airlines in atlanta are at the bottom end of the scale!
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: jayceon on June 19, 2011, 10:52:11 am
Good luck to the three of you in Atlanta, your going to need it.
This is so ridiculous... If I'd known 3 people were going to hub in Atlanta right off the bat I would have switched it up and hubbed in Orlando, or Minneapolis... in this scenario I think it will be wise to fly to a lot of those smaller airports... Best of luck to everyone!
Shocker. Atlanta has always been the most popular airport because its size. Normally it's not much of a challenge to start there, but with the rules in this world, it's a lot harder. Same thing at O'Hare, Beijing, Heathrow and basically every other 50mln+ airport.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: Dobbins on June 19, 2011, 03:53:07 pm
Good luck to the three of you in Atlanta, your going to need it.
This is so ridiculous... If I'd known 3 people were going to hub in Atlanta right off the bat I would have switched it up and hubbed in Orlando, or Minneapolis... in this scenario I think it will be wise to fly to a lot of those smaller airports... Best of luck to everyone!
Shocker. Atlanta has always been the most popular airport because its size. Normally it's not much of a challenge to start there, but with the rules in this world, it's a lot harder. Same thing at O'Hare, Beijing, Heathrow and basically every other 50mln+ airport.
Exactly. Until Airline Value goes up, the people at the biggest disadvantage are those that hubbed at Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, London (myself), Paris, and Beijing. It seems smart to start at Seychelles, and maybe it is, but it will be interesting to see how fast everyone catches up once our DOCs go through the roof.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: BINDU on June 19, 2011, 04:08:23 pm
Dobbins; I'm UniteContinental in the world, and I was wondering. I am going to be travelling from the middle of next week through July 1st. So from the day I leave till the day I get back; could I get a holiday from the reset?
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 19, 2011, 04:50:33 pm
Sure, but I think you'll be fine. Someone at Atlanta is going down. I am also going to be traveling on the 26th-28th, but I think we'll both be fine.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: East West Airlines on June 19, 2011, 05:27:08 pm
Someone at Atlanta *shudders :P
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: jayceon on June 19, 2011, 08:16:26 pm
Exactly. Until Airline Value goes up, the people at the biggest disadvantage are those that hubbed at Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, London (myself), Paris, and Beijing. It seems smart to start at Seychelles, and maybe it is, but it will be interesting to see how fast everyone catches up once our DOCs go through the roof.
Yes, but if I compare my airline to yours; if you have a DOC of 150mln, all I need is 50mln to keep up with you. Thing is that Moscow isn't, geographical speaking, the best place to be. But airlines based somewhere in the middle of Europe, say Zürich, have a great advantage. Still, I'm up for this challenge :) I really like the idea of this world and time will tell who got the best strategy :D
Btw, quick question, if one gets a reset, is it possible for that person to restart? Or do you ban them.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 19, 2011, 08:56:39 pm
No one will be banned. I rather hope that anyone who is reset will keep playing.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: AirbusL1011 on June 19, 2011, 11:24:20 pm
so, in theory, a middle-sized airport such as melbourne tullamarine (23,943,342 pax) is one of the best, because small size dosn't limit growth, and a large airport means that you get a lower score?
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: East West Airlines on June 20, 2011, 01:46:37 am
Ok so now there's two deltas... both based out of Atlanta......... grrr :lol:
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 20, 2011, 02:55:36 am
So let me get this straight. There are now four airlines out of Atlanta, which is a quarter of the players in the game, and two of them are named delta, which lacks all imagination, and the first elimination is in 10 days.
If you get eliminated and would like to change hubs, please be sure to PM me.
And yes, those mid sized airports such as Moscow, Melbourne, and Memphis may indeed be the best.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: East West Airlines on June 20, 2011, 03:04:59 am
If my calculations are correct these are the current scores.
CaribbeanBlue SJU 38.25 IndeanOcean Air SEZ, SSH 37.00 British European Airlines MAN 18.89 Sotsialisticheskikj Respublic Avialinii DME 15.60 Australia Blue MEL 12.39 Anandha Airlines CGK 8.20 Jetaway International Airlines CDG 7.12 Locust Air DFW 7.01 UniteContinental ORD 7.00 Royal Atlantic Airways LHR 6.07 Western Connection ATL 5.17 Delta Airline ATL 4.75 AsiaAir PEK 4.30 LinkAir ATL 4.13 Delta Airlines ATL 3.37 Brussels Airlines ??? ????
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops wo
Post by: Dobbins on June 20, 2011, 03:51:39 am
Thing is that Moscow isn't, geographical speaking, the best place to be. But airlines based somewhere in the middle of Europe, say Zürich, have a great advantage.
That is the big reason I think Indian Ocean Air out of Seychelles could be in trouble in a bit, unless they open up another hub on the mainland.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 20, 2011, 03:58:01 am
Ah, and I see that they have. Well this should make it a little more interesting.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: AirbusL1011 on June 20, 2011, 09:01:15 am
who's brussels airlines?? ?? they dont have any routes!
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: jayceon on June 20, 2011, 10:05:45 am
Yes, it's a shame Brussels Airlines isn't doing a thing. He got a great hub there! Very much in the center of Europe with 18.5mln pax.
Title: Re: WORLD IS OPEN! PW1991 FIRST RESET-JUNE 28}Ultra Competitive/Realistic ops world
Post by: Dobbins on June 20, 2011, 07:41:12 pm
I have noticed a problem with the elimination system. I stated that no airline would be reset within the first twelve RW days, but airlines are joining late, which means they won't have the full year to grow. Here is the new plan. Any airline which joins will have 10-15 days depending on when they joined before they will be eligible to be reset. If an airline joins within three days of a reset, they will have 15 days (they will be immune from the next two), but if they join four days or more before a reset, they will only have immunity for that reset.
In other words, lets say ABC Air joins on June 29th. Since the next reset is July 2nd, and the one after that is July 8th, they will have immunity from both resets. If they join on June 28th, they will only have immunity for the July second reset.
That sounds confusing, but I am just trying to make it fair. Also, I have moved the first reset back to July 2nd, and all airlines that have already joined and any airlines which join between now and June 23rd will be eligible to be reset. This has been added to the OP.
Que the questions and complaints.
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: AirbusL1011 on June 20, 2011, 11:06:14 pm
then i can only say that its going to be one helluva ride managing this world.
TransSky alliance has been opened-i have recieved permission from AirbusGuy350 to create it. the people who wished to join (AirbusGuy350, secretformula and myself) can now join, and any others can if they want.
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Japanair on June 21, 2011, 01:32:32 am
Seems like a really interesting world. I think I'll begin my return to AM here. I might join today or tomorrow if I have the time and will probably base in Europe. (maybe Rome FCO, Zurich, CPH or Munich, I'll see) :D
So If I join tomorrow, I'll be immune to any resets within my first year of operations?
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Dobbins on June 21, 2011, 01:38:10 am
There is no reset for the rest of this month, that way all of us can get established. So no, you will not receive immunity if you join before June 23rd, and if you join after June 23rd, you will be immune for the first reset, but we will all have a one week jump on you anyway.
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Japanair on June 21, 2011, 01:43:19 am
OK. I'll try to join ASAP then. Thanks!
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic w
Post by: East West Airlines on June 21, 2011, 03:43:09 am
HAH! one of the delta airlines changed their name to American... still unbelievably uncreative... and still killing me, every time i log in I have to lower my prices a bit...
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Dobbins on June 21, 2011, 05:17:41 am
Updated standings, just for fun.
Vuvuzeland 86.58 CaribbeanBlue 40.43 Indian Ocean 38.81 British European 21.66 Sotsialist#$%#$@%& 17.21 Indigoair 13.06 Australia Blue 12.38 Jetaway International 9.39 Northwest 9.13 UniteContinental 9.02 Anandha 8.87 Locust 7.85 Republic West 7.81 Elisa 7.68 Royal Atlantic 7.05 Western Connection 6.52 Darkroyal 6.23 American 5.62 LinkAir 4.60 AsiaAir 4.53 Delta Airlines 3.86 Brussels (No Flights) 0 Reyes (No Flights) 0
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Dobbins on June 21, 2011, 06:42:50 am
We are up to 25 airlines now, with the latest two being out of Las Vegas, and a second airline out of London Heathrow (I am the first 8))
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: AirbusL1011 on June 21, 2011, 07:13:31 am
Just a suggestion, but maybe we could move the standings to the message board in-game, so that any players not on the forum will be able to post comments.
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: jayceon on June 22, 2011, 01:49:23 pm
Just a suggestion, but maybe we could move the standings to the message board in-game, so that any players not on the forum will be able to post comments.
Good idea. Also post the rules there so people are familiar with the them. It wouldn't be much of a surprise either once they get reset if their performance keeps behind.
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: GQfluffy on June 27, 2011, 06:31:15 am
Ah hell...I'll join up tomorrow. Y'all need a little Fluff in your life. ^-^
I'm not sure yet where I'll be going; I don't even know where I've been. As I said in another thread...I'm not even sure of the rules of the game. I'm just thinking of staying with aircraft below 100 passengers. Just for fun. Just to see if I can do it. And if I get reset due to...'real life', then so be it.
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: AirbusL1011 on July 01, 2011, 07:58:06 am
I'm going to be away from 2nd july to the 13th, so can you please reveal the standings so that i can improve my airline if needed-?
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Dobbins on July 01, 2011, 09:22:56 pm
Since there are now 47 players and many of them have multiple hubs, it takes me a long time to update standing-like an hour or more, so sorry, if you want to find out exactly where you stand, you'll have to do it yourself. My advice is look at the formula in the original post, figure out where your airline is at, and find a couple of weaker airlines, run their numbers, and make sure your airline is okay.
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: AirbusL1011 on July 02, 2011, 12:49:35 am
Thx, we wont be pestering you again for standings-i think!
Title: Re: WORLD OPEN! PW1991 TINY CHANGE 1st RESET-JUL 2}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Dobbins on July 02, 2011, 08:44:42 pm
Immunity AAA Airline Date Joined 1st Hub PAX 2nd Hub PAX 3rd Hub PAX Total Hub Pax Airline Value Score Taxi Aereo Marilia 22-Jun Belo Horizonte Carlos Prates 13172 13172 $224,821,630 17068.147 Vuvuzeland 20-Jun Cork 3250000 3250000 $434,366,098 133.651 * Pacific Air Taxi 25-Jun Tahiti Faa'a 1232733 Nadi (Fiji) 1300000 2532733 $210,295,203 83.031 CaribbeanBlue 17-Jun San Juan 8189324 8189324 $672,283,048 82.093 Indigoair 21-Jun Zurich 21926872 21926872 $1,522,968,067 69.457 Sotsialist#$%#$@%& 18-Jun Moscow Domodedovo 20437516 20437516 $1,397,382,307 68.373 Indian Ocean 18-Jun Seychelles 354000 Sharm El Sheikh 7430940 7784940 $528,562,079 67.895 * Air Polska Express 27-Jun Warsaw 8282035 8282035 $455,018,553 54.94 Medan 21-Jun Polonia 4648136 4648136 $243,096,926 52.3 UniteContinental 17-Jun Chicago O'hare 62271464 62271464 $2,837,605,589 45.568 Western Connection 17-Jun Atlanta 84561736 84561736 $3,588,987,532 42.442 Jetaway International 17-Jun Paris Charles De Gaulle 57906866 Frankfurt 50932840 108839706 $4,322,928,399 39.718 Aero Rossiya 22-Jun Moscow Domodedovo 20437516 20437516 $721,439,936 35.23 Republic West 21-Jun Phoenix 37119294 37119294 $1,195,390,855 32.204 Desert Express 21-Jun Las Vegas 38719786 38719786 $1,186,070,317 30.632 Aegean 21-Jun Istanbul Ataturk 29757384 29757384 $811,879,953 27.783 * Mid Continent 23-Jun Chicago O'hare 62271464 62271464 $1,621,901,741 26.046 Der Frankfurter 21-Jun Frankfurt 50932840 Amsterdam 47429741 98362581 $2,379,248,484 24.189 # Americaflight 1-Jul Saint Louis 12168140 12168140 $286,070,321 23.51 * Germania 23-Jun Frankfurt 50932840 50932840 $1,106,463,369 21.724 * Sunset 23-Jun Miami 32375536 32375536 $684,457,762 21.141 British European 17-Jun Manchester 18724889 London Heathrow 66036957 84761846 $1,755,185,947 20.707 Philippine 22-Jun Manila Ninoy Aquino 24108554 24108554 $492,754,965 20.439 * International Europe 24-Jun Paris Orly 25107693 25107693 $490,019,587 19.517 Euroliner 21-Jun London Heathrow 66036957 Paris Charles De Gaulle 57906866 123943823 $2,069,249,676 16.695 American 17-Jun Atlanta 84561736 84561736 $1,274,439,508 15.071 Royal Atlantic 16-Jun London Heathrow 66036957 Los Angeles 54879794 120916751 $1,803,406,019 14.914 Iberia 22-Jun Madrid 48270581 48270581 $717,445,759 14.863 Emirates 21-Jun Dubai 40901752 40901752 $605,949,631 14.815 Locust 17-Jun Dallas Fort Worth 53327968 Denver 48011984 101339952 $1,307,462,915 12.902 Anandha 17-Jun Jakarta 31532094 Polonia 4648136 36180230 $428,905,611 11.855 Bombay International 21-Jun Mumbai Chhatrapati 23435723 Delhi Indira Gandhi 22843415 46279138 $546,808,031 11.815 Elisa 21-Jun Singapore 37203978 37203978 $432,916,251 11.636 * Wings Worldwide 23-Jun New York JFK 45420544 45420544 $519,193,014 11.431 * Singapore Horizone 23-Jun Singapore 37203978 37203978 $423,421,338 11.381 Australia Blue 17-Jun Melbourne 23943342 Sydney 32700964 56644306 $554,873,416 9.796 LinkAir 17-Jun Atlanta 84561736 84561736 $793,336,762 9.382 # Fluffy Flyways 29-Jun Toronto 32334831 32334831 $296,647,130 9.174 * BiGHO 27-Jun Hong Kong 46133000 46133000 $395,912,696 8.582 Delta 20-Jun Atlanta 84561736 New York JFK 45420544 129982280 $1,092,551,852 8.405 Northwest 21-Jun Minneapolis 31102412 Charlotte 34330752 Denver 48011984 113445148 $909,311,749 8.015 Air China 21-Jun Beijing 65375095 Guangzhou 37048712 102423807 $798,284,247 7.794 Darkroyal 20-Jun Hong Kong 46133000 Tokyo Haneda 66735587 112868587 $865,749,158 7.67 AsiaAir 19-Jun Beijing 65375095 65375095 $478,790,979 7.324 * Pan American 26-Jun Miami 32375536 New York JFK 45420544 77796080 $523,194,596 6.725 # Flex 2-Jul Dubai 40901752 40901752 $243,753,589 5.959
Title: Re: 1st RESET EXECUTED, NEXT RESET JULY 8th}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Dobbins on July 02, 2011, 08:48:43 pm
ASIA AIR GO OUT OF BUSINESS DUE TO LACK OF GROWTH.
AsiaAir, hubbed in Beijing, was reset today. With only 11 routes from their only hub, a lack of growth saw AsiaAir get choked out of their only hub by larger competitors. Best of luck to them in their future airline endeavors!
Next reset will occur on July 8th.
Title: Re: 1st RESET EXECUTED, NEXT RESET JULY 8th}Ultra Competitive/Realistic world
Post by: Dobbins on July 08, 2011, 05:29:53 pm
HERE ARE THE RESULTS OF THE JULY 8TH RESET. NEXT RESET IS JULY 14TH!
Immunity AAA Airline Date Joined 1st Hub PAX 2nd Hub PAX 3rd Hub PAX Total Hub Pax Value Score