Airline Mogul Forum

Airline Mogul => General Chat => Topic started by: lhenning on June 16, 2008, 07:33:07 pm

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: lhenning on June 16, 2008, 07:33:07 pm

Hi!

Just a question why is there a forth pilot in some of the A300 models?

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: Tiger In Training on June 16, 2008, 08:42:44 pm

As thats how many pilots are recomended to pilot it by Airbus.

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: Fleur-de-Lis on June 17, 2008, 07:30:52 pm

If you're worried about that, then don't acquire any Tupolev's or Ilyushin's.
;)

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: Blue Sky Mine on June 17, 2008, 10:33:28 pm

Quote from: "Fleur-de-Lis"

If you're worried about that, then don't acquire any Tupolev's or Ilyushin's.
;)

But Airbusses are no Tupolevs or Illushins :P

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: karnc on June 23, 2008, 03:52:00 am

PIC + F/O + S/O

I think that was requirement for A300.

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: Mosha on June 23, 2008, 05:48:27 am

So when we get to 747-400 11 - 12 hour flights they should be double crewed.

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: Dan380 on June 23, 2008, 12:44:35 pm

Now you're getting into complicated stuff. It would depend on route lengths and airlines preference too. For Instance a trans-atlantic flight in a 744 would likely have a 3 man crew (Cap F/O + S/O) but a flight at full range might have a 4 man crew. That could get complicated as the parameters are not set and are left at the disgretion of the airline.

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: zenmen5 on June 28, 2008, 02:52:42 pm

I though  It was PIO+SPIO+NAV?

Title: 4th pilot in A300
Post by: Dan380 on June 28, 2008, 06:22:45 pm

The Naviagtor may be another name for the fight engineer. Although I thought the A300 was the first aircraft to go without them  :?