Airline Mogul Forum
Airline Mogul => Game Data => Topic started by: Japanair on March 06, 2008, 03:15:53 am
-
It looks like YYZ actually has 31,507,349 passengers...
(Source: Canada Flight Supplement) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_Pearson_International_Airport
-
Dam. Seattle has 200,000 less pax than Toronto
-
haha... used to be about 300 thousand difference...
getting closer!
EDIT: This is my 200th post! :D
-
I got an email from the Port of Seattle, saying that the pax amount this year will like go over 34 million... They said between 33 and 35.5 million :shock:
It also said that by 2020, SEA could have up between 40-45 million pax a year :shock:
-
I got an email from the Port of Seattle, saying that the pax amount this year will like go over 34 million... They said between 33 and 35.5 million :shock:
It also said that by 2020, SEA could have up between 40-45 million pax a year :shock:
Do you think AM will be still there and you will still playing that time :wink: :roll: :lol:
-
I got an email from the Port of Seattle, saying that the pax amount this year will like go over 34 million... They said between 33 and 35.5 million :shock:
It also said that by 2020, SEA could have up between 40-45 million pax a year :shock:
Do you think AM will be still there and you will still playing that time :wink: :roll: :lol:
Don't know. Never say never.
-
Don't know. Never say never.
Yeah, it is JUST another 12 years. I'll be 45 years old then. Dont know if I would still be able to understand the rules. :lol: Maybe Stephen doesnt either and we wont have any rules anymore :lol: But we are going off-topic :shock:
-
I'm not gonna lock it, I like philosophical-future-threads :P
Maybe AM will be a full-blown, feature-richer-than-now management game simulating every aspect of airline management, but hey, who knows...
@JapanAir: To be fully numerically correct, we would need a non-wiki source for this. Although this specific article seems to properly quote its sources, you can never be really sure :) If you actually have the Canada Flight Supplement, we'd love to hear :)
-
I'm not gonna lock it, I like philosophical-future-threads :P
Maybe AM will be a full-blown, feature-richer-than-now management game simulating every aspect of airline management, but hey, who knows...
Or may be AM reaches a level of realsim where we are used by actual airlines for planning? :lol:
-
That's the point where you should sell it and start all over again. :lol:
-
That's the point where you should sell it and start all over again. :lol:
Yeah, the pub game we were talking about in another thread two months ago :lol:
-
I'm not gonna lock it, I like philosophical-future-threads :P
Maybe AM will be a full-blown, feature-richer-than-now management game simulating every aspect of airline management, but hey, who knows...
Or may be AM reaches a level of realsim where we are used by actual airlines for planning? :lol:
You would be better off fantansizing living together with MrOrange happily forever :lol:
-
You might not believe it, but I can actually be quite likeable. You just haven't seen the nicer me yet. :twisted:
-
You might not believe it, but I can actually be quite likeable. You just haven't seen the nicer me yet. :twisted:
But i thought you aren't made that way? :? .... or maybe we just haven't seen the... (censored)... side of you yet. :twisted:
-
@JapanAir: To be fully numerically correct, we would need a non-wiki source for this. Although this specific article seems to properly quote its sources, you can never be really sure :) If you actually have the Canada Flight Supplement, we'd love to hear :)
The article properly linked to the airport's website stating the statistics... data pulled from there and updated. that was close enough for me.
-
Missed that citation. Thanks for the update.
-
Don't know. Never say never.
Yeah, it is JUST another 12 years. I'll be 45 years old then. Dont know if I would still be able to understand the rules. :lol: Maybe Stephen doesnt either and we wont have any rules anymore :lol: But we are going off-topic :shock:
I'll be 26 at that time.
-
Don't know. Never say never.
Yeah, it is JUST another 12 years. I'll be 45 years old then. Dont know if I would still be able to understand the rules. :lol: Maybe Stephen doesnt either and we wont have any rules anymore :lol: But we are going off-topic :shock:
I'll be 26 at that time.
and I'll almost be 26. lol