Airline Mogul => General Chat => Topic started by: wwnliu123 on October 14, 2007, 05:31:03 pm
Title: New comer advantage on a route
Post by: wwnliu123 on October 14, 2007, 05:31:03 pm
This issue was raised in the previous round. Whenever a new competitor enter a route, even though the new competitor set the route to the exact same price and frequency, the existing airline will always suffer a drop in the load factor, and the new comer can walk away with 100% load factor. And that result in endless price cut. Has the load factor algorithm been altered for addressing that? Cause I already see this happening all over again. I got to say the situation is better than last round. But I am just wondering whether it is because it is still the beginning of the round or the changes in the algorithm is working?
Title: New comer advantage on a route
Post by: d3funct on October 14, 2007, 05:42:42 pm
How does that differ to the real world?
If plane B offers $500 for a route and plane A offers $200 - are you suggesting that plane B should still retain its 100% loadfactor? Its called competition.
Or have I misunderstood you..?
Title: New comer advantage on a route
Post by: pseudoswede on October 14, 2007, 06:22:20 pm
Yes.
In the game, if Airline A has a $500 route, then Airline B jumps on that route and charges $500. Airline B gets the 100% load factor while Airline A got a much lower load factor. In theory, since they are both the same price (and if they're both using the same plane/frequency), they should have an equal number of passengers.
Example...
Both airlines use 50-passenger plane. The route can handle 90 passengers. If both airlines charge the same fare, each plane should have 45 passengers each (90% load factor).
Instead it's a LIFO (last-in-first-out), where the last person to charge that fare gets 50 passengers, and the "incumbent" only gets 40 (80% load factor).
Title: New comer advantage on a route
Post by: Air Elbonia on October 14, 2007, 06:59:22 pm
there is a slight bias towards new entrants on a route. I'll look into a way to minimize this bias however, as i have an idea. a few bugpatches come first though, sorry.
(the only reason the bias is there is because i need the script to know which result was the new one when it organizes them for processing; if you want to rationalize it, i find "new entrant market buzz" can be moderately useful at times.)