/* * Patch for filter_var() */ if(!function_exists('filter_var')){ define('FILTER_VALIDATE_IP', 'ip'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV4', 'ipv4'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV6', 'ipv6'); define('FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL', 'email'); define('FILTER_FLAG_EMAIL_UNICODE', 'unicode'); function filter_var($variable, $filter, $option = false){ if($filter == 'ip'){ if($option == 'ipv4'){ if(preg_match("/(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } if($option == 'ipv6'){ if(preg_match("/\s*(([:.]{0,7}[0-9a-fA-F]{0,4}){1,8})\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } if($filter == 'email'){ if($option == 'unicode' || $option == false){ if(preg_match("/\s*(\S*@\S*\.\S*)\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } } }
Sorry Jay, I'd have to disagree! I run my airlines as multi-frequency to keep competition away :D and when I have a left over 767 from a TATL with 3-4 hours, I add it to a route to ORD, DFW, ATL, or a 300K airport! They do really make money!
..... and it doesn't create a bad reputation for you (multi frequencies are really, really annoying)....
well what i did was.. have one aircraft fly two of the same route. both on 1frenquency but the first one is priced higher than the other.. both bring in profit. is there a downside to this?Yes, as stated above, you will make more profit by sending one of those planes to a second destination instead of the same one. Though you won't lose money by having more than one frequency, it will bring down ticket prices and route profit (possibly loadfactor too).
In my situation it was beneficial to have two airplanes travel the same routes. I currently only had 4 or 5 destinations and one airplane flying all of them and another airplane collecting dust. I kept the other airplane because I had a good priced lease on it and would soon need it. Anyways I assigned it routes and my monthly +profit went up hugely allowing me to rent more gates. Once new gates are rented you can assign your aircraft to those routes instead and make more money. Only reason to have more then one plane flying a route is when you have one sitting around, don't have enough rented gates to utilize an aircraft, or in order to control a route and destroy your competition.
I agree with you, my priority was to basically say the 2 point you made.In my situation it was beneficial to have two airplanes travel the same routes. I currently only had 4 or 5 destinations and one airplane flying all of them and another airplane collecting dust. I kept the other airplane because I had a good priced lease on it and would soon need it. Anyways I assigned it routes and my monthly +profit went up hugely allowing me to rent more gates. Once new gates are rented you can assign your aircraft to those routes instead and make more money. Only reason to have more then one plane flying a route is when you have one sitting around, don't have enough rented gates to utilize an aircraft, or in order to control a route and destroy your competition.
1. It's nearly impossible to flood a route to drive a competitor to bankruptcy.
2. Unless you already have routes to every single airport within that aircraft's range, there is never a need to use two aircraft on the same route.