Airline Mogul Forum

Airline Mogul => Game Data => Topic started by: JDubman on February 15, 2007, 03:04:06 am

Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: JDubman on February 15, 2007, 03:04:06 am
I have noticed a couple things in the airport database

- Harrisburg ID 571: The airport code is currently HAR.  It is actually supposed to be MDT.

- There are two Tucson, Arizona's with the same airport code.  There is "Tuscon ID 319" and "Tucson ID 34".  The difference there is the spelling.  The correct one should be "Tucson ID 34".  The other one should be removed.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on February 15, 2007, 03:37:58 am
Ok, I changed Harrisonburg to MDT, but we're going to have to wait for Stephen to log on to delete the duplicate Tucson's....
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: d1-3508 on February 15, 2007, 03:55:19 am
Also, Dili Comoro is a duplicate.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on February 23, 2007, 10:48:02 pm
Rockford-Chicagoland(RFD)  2006 pax number was 210,253, not 2.1 million.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on February 25, 2007, 06:41:25 am
Alright! Its been fixed! :) I guess I got a little bti zero-happy when I put it in! Thanks for notifying us!
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on February 25, 2007, 05:27:12 pm
Mobile, AL  correct airport code is MOB, not BFM.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: gizgiz on February 27, 2007, 01:31:29 am
Ottowa is spelt Oh-Tee-Tee-AY-DoubleYou-Ay
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on February 27, 2007, 06:47:55 am
There are still 2 TUS- Tucson.  With differing passenger numbers.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: StephenM on February 27, 2007, 08:44:30 am
I've removed one, can anyone confirm the passenger numbers for TUS please?
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: MrOrange on February 27, 2007, 08:54:28 am
4,226,759 passengers in 2006 (http://www.tucsonairport.org/html/tia_tiafacts.html)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: BritishInternational on February 27, 2007, 04:33:31 pm
Just too let you know Southamton is actually spelt Southampton.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: JDubman on March 06, 2007, 03:41:17 am
TUS ID 34 (Tucson) has a gate cost of 4,226,759.  That should be the airport traffic number instead.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Albion on March 06, 2007, 01:32:49 pm
Ottawa actually has only one airport called YOW. It's "Ottawa-Macdonald-Cartier".

Btw, it had 3,809,000 passengers in 2006
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottawa_Macdonald-Cartier_International_Airport)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: EXTspotter on March 10, 2007, 08:36:16 am
Inishmaan in ireland is in the wrong place. I tired to make a route to LHR and it said it was 3650nm away. Not even Donegal is 3650nm away! Not by a long way.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on March 17, 2007, 01:29:07 pm
Quote from: "Heavy"
Spambot rubbish - Edited by StephenM


 :roll:  Yep, that sure is an Airport inaccuracy...

 :lol:
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on March 19, 2007, 07:37:29 am
Cebu-Mactan International Airport, is listed as NOP. the real one is CEB.

(RPVM/CEB - Philippines)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on March 19, 2007, 08:35:25 am
oh yeah, and DVO . Davao Airport, Philippines also has a duplicate..

the correct DVO is the 1,200,000 PAXand 84,600 Cargo

and It is Cebu-Mactan , not Mactan-Cebu

 :)  cheers
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: MrOrange on March 19, 2007, 12:58:56 pm
Airport ID 100 (Granada): Airport code should be GRX, is now GRO.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on March 20, 2007, 07:24:13 am
Also, Kaohsiung (KHH) is in Taiwan.. Not JAPAN!!
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on March 24, 2007, 10:12:21 am
Kuching International Airport, KCH, handled 3.35 million passengers and 28,406 metric tonnes of cargo, you can imagine how much it has expanded since 2005, with expansions with the airport in progress.

On AM. Kuching is listed with 2,022,158 PAX, and 53,562 tons of cargo

Obviously a big difference. Thanks

and i also added some more info in the airport suggestions, Some Airport numbers are out of wack compared to what they really are.. i hope everyone is not making them up just to see them in game.. we need some accuracy so we don't need any more edit's later on :)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on March 31, 2007, 04:40:29 am
Cebu-Mactan (not Mactan-Cebu) , it is CEB , not NOP.. NOP is a small dirt airstrip on Mactan island..

Davao International Airport, DVO has a duplicate (the smaller PAX number is the correct one)

Kaohsiung (KHH) is in Taiwan.. Not JAPAN!!

Taipei is in Taiwan, not TAIPEI!!

Theres A duplicate of Manado - Sam Ratulangi Airport (MDC) , The correct one is the one with the most PAX number.


Just to some up all the mistakes in the Asia Region, that i have found.

Thanks in advance, when you fix them.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on March 31, 2007, 05:58:44 am
I fixed all the ones with incorrect information but we will have to wait for Stephen to get the duplicate ones.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on March 31, 2007, 08:57:11 am
:)  Thanks, although the info for Cebu-Mactan wasn't done,

IATA: CEB
NAME: Cebu-Mactan International Airport

thanks for all your work!
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on March 31, 2007, 03:22:50 pm
Rochester Intl. (ROC) is in the wrong location.

Its shows as a 6478 mi flight from there to Kansas City(MCI).  While making that drive seems like its that far, its really about 800 nautical miles.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Air Elbonia on April 01, 2007, 02:41:38 am
dangit, i was about to say that about rochester int'l (but from msp instead of kc).

anyways.  "Manhattan Regional" in Kansas, USA is spelled in this game "Mahattan Regional"

EDIT: here's Rochester Int'ls (ROC) proper coord's.

43°07′07.9″N, 77°40′20.6″W  my calc's place rochester int'l in the system somewhere around the mid-east/africa/asia viscinity last i saw.

EDIT 2:

While i'm at it, i ran across a canadian statistics site...

Goose Bay's (YYR) enplanements: 51331, deplanements 52970 not 0 :roll:

edit edit:

I damn well hope tuscon isn't this expensive...

View     TUS     Tucson     92     €4,226,759     1,863,790     84,207     United States     Rent
    (who has a gate cost of 4,226,759?)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on April 21, 2007, 01:21:38 pm
Kathmandu-Tribhuvan (KTM), Nepal

Nepal is in Asia, NOT Africa  :lol: heheh, you know, 'Mount Everest' , Asia  :)

Cheers, and thanks for the new airports! nice job!

cheers,
tom
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: d1-3508 on April 22, 2007, 07:16:50 am
Cargo Stats: (2006 figures)
Adelaide: 19,319 tons
Melbourne: 208,044 tons

Brisbane and Sydney will posted later this week.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Air Elbonia on April 30, 2007, 06:58:13 pm
May i request again that Rochester Int'l (USA, north america), as well as Inishmaan (ireland, europe) have their coordinates corrected?

in game each lists as 6000nm+ from MSP, yet on great circle...

From      To      Initial
Heading      Distance   
MSP (44°52'55"N 93°13'18"W)    IIA (53°05'31"N 09°34'12"W)    48°    (NE)    3625 mi
MSP (44°52'55"N 93°13'18"W)    ROC (43°07'08"N 77°40'21"W)    93°    (E)    783 mi
Total:          4409 mi

I realize there are discrepancies between the two relatively often, but not that significant of a discrepancy.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Air Elbonia on May 06, 2007, 09:15:20 pm
New one, simple one, kinda silly one.

LAF (Purdue University Airport, Indiana USA) was placed into Asia.  understandable as it was in the midst of a long long string of chinese airports.

edit: there is also a Leknes (LKN) located in "Asia", which is a duplicate with severely lacking information. ap id 598

edit2: LAF seems fixed, i fixed ROC's placement (for real this time it seems).  fixed the small spelling error in manhattan regional airport, KS.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on May 19, 2007, 04:12:37 pm
HGR  shows 50k pax in DataBase.  Faa says 10,126.
CYS  shows 22,504 pax in DB. FAA says 45,008.
BTM shows 40,653 pax in DB.  FAA says 85,502.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: StephenM on May 20, 2007, 10:57:25 am
Quote from: "CornField"
CYS  shows 22,504 pax in DB. FAA says 45,008.
BTM shows 40,653 pax in DB.  FAA says 85,502.


Does that look like boarding numbers as opposed to pax that went in?  :idea:
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on May 20, 2007, 12:55:56 pm
Quote from: "StephenM"
Quote from: "CornField"
CYS  shows 22,504 pax in DB. FAA says 45,008.
BTM shows 40,653 pax in DB.  FAA says 85,502.


Does that look like boarding numbers as opposed to pax that went in?  :idea:


First I blew the CYS one.  FAA actually shows 15127 enplanements in 2005.  But they define an emplanement as 2 passengers.  They don't differentiate between boarding and debarking passengers.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: tomauer on July 03, 2007, 02:39:48 am
DVO

Davao, has a dupe.

The correct one has 1,510,264 pax number.

no one has gone into the smaller one with 1,200,000 pax, so it should be an easy delete (i wouldnt know though  :roll: )


This is the ID of the CORRECT airport, don't delete this one.

http://www.airlinemogul.com/airlinemogul/view_airport.php?id=470

--

This is the ID of the DUPLICATE airport, this one needs deletin.

http://www.airlinemogul.com/airlinemogul/view_airport.php?id=794

--
and im not sure if davao has 50 gates only, it looks like the info is mixed about the duplicate, since the duplicate has 100 gates, yet it's got the wrong pax number..

.. so far, thats the only "error" i found.. the only other, being a simple naming error for CEB airport.

It isn't called: Mactan-Cebu International Airport.

it is called: Cebu-Mactan International Airport.


EDIT: i just found another duplicate, this time,  Dili (Comoro) Airport (DIL), in Timor-Leste, theres 2 exactly the same airports, 1 dupe obviously. ID for them are, 705, 706.

ID=706 is the only one of the DIL airports in use by an AM airline. (someone has 1x gate)



hope this helps
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: StephenM on July 03, 2007, 10:58:10 am
All fixed I hope!
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: dktc on July 29, 2007, 11:30:59 am
Pax for Ohrid, Macedonia should be 50366 instead of 300,000 we have in the database. Airport id 1197.

source: http://ohd.airports.com.mk/aboutUs_TrafficFigures.htm
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Pro Air on August 07, 2007, 02:03:13 am
2 Things in Canada-

There are 2 YOW's, the one labeled "Ottowa" can probably go.

Hamilton was recently set up, but its passenger count is way overstated.  According to its annual report, it had 527, 133 in 2006.

http://www.flyhi.ca/pdf/HI053%20Ann%20Report%20All.pdf
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on August 07, 2007, 02:46:40 am
FIXED
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on August 08, 2007, 12:16:33 am
Pago Pago (PPG)

D-base shows 10,640 pax.

FAA shows 113,410 pax
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on August 12, 2007, 05:25:41 am
Long Island McArthur ISP-> D-base says 20,575 pax.  FAA says 2,111,664

BTV  D-base says 100,000  FAA says 690,641

ACY  D-base shows 40,368  FAA says 467,148

SBA  D-base shows 89,548  FAA says 431,079
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Air Elbonia on August 12, 2007, 05:28:35 am
fixed Long Island Macarthur. now i'm off for a bit.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Coastal on August 21, 2007, 10:59:26 pm
Quote from: "CornField"
Long Island McArthur ISP-> D-base says 20,575 pax.  FAA says 2,111,664

BTV  D-base says 100,000  FAA says 690,641

ACY  D-base shows 40,368  FAA says 467,148

SBA  D-base shows 89,548  FAA says 431,079



just to update cornfields ACY numbers FAA has 2006 enplanements as 458,020 but if your using enplanements and deplanements to get the total passengers the only number i can find is from 2004 @ 1,050,172 that number is from the ACY website:
http://www.sjta.com/acairport/about.asp
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on August 21, 2007, 11:51:36 pm
Quote from: "Coastal"
Quote from: "CornField"
Long Island McArthur ISP-> D-base says 20,575 pax.  FAA says 2,111,664

BTV  D-base says 100,000  FAA says 690,641

ACY  D-base shows 40,368  FAA says 467,148

SBA  D-base shows 89,548  FAA says 431,079



just to update cornfields ACY numbers FAA has 2006 enplanements as 458,020 but if your using enplanements and deplanements to get the total passengers the only number i can find is from 2004 @ 1,050,172 that number is from the ACY website:
http://www.sjta.com/acairport/about.asp


My ACY number is the offical FAA enplanements for 2005,  I neglected to double it....   FAA doesn't release offical 2006 numbers until Oct. 2007
But the ACY number would match the FAA 2004 number.  But they are showing a declining trend.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Coastal on August 22, 2007, 12:31:47 am
thanks for clearing up the ACY numbers cornfield. I noticed that about their declining traffic, but at least there is a positiveness this year as the airport claims to have a 40% increase in traffic for the first 6 months of this year
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on August 25, 2007, 01:03:34 am
Missoula,MT (MSO)

D-base shows  539 pax
FAA says 542998

Chattanooga,TN (CHA)
D-base shows 6,000,000
FAA says 498,792
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on August 25, 2007, 08:32:13 pm
Should be fixed :)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on August 26, 2007, 03:16:25 pm
SBP  D-base shows 800,000  FAA shows 349,756

GTF  D-base shows 124,377  FAA shows 313,718

GJT Cargo shows 8,269 tonnes  FAA shows 37,811 tonnes

GJT D-base shows 280,870  FAA shows 313,630

BFL  D-bases 780,711  FAA shows 293,214
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: DHC on August 29, 2007, 10:32:54 am
Al Ain (AAN) is in United Arab Emirates, not Afghanistan.

Kingston, (KIN) is in Jamaica, not Bahamas.

http://www.azworldairports.com/ show that Doha (DOH) has 9,377,003 Passengers in 2005. So the Capacity isn't that low.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Air Elbonia on September 02, 2007, 12:09:14 am
Should be fixed (CF and the above).
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: raphaelmak on September 03, 2007, 12:51:55 pm
Code of Yibin, China should be YBP not YPB
YPB is actually Port Alberni, British Columbia
http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gclookup?Q=Yibin
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: dktc on September 03, 2007, 01:26:29 pm
Quote from: "raphaelmak"
Code of Yibin, China should be YBP not YPB
YPB is actually Port Alberni, British Columbia
http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gclookup?Q=Yibin


Another typo :cry: ... could someone go through all the airports I entered and see how many more typos I made?
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Jps on September 03, 2007, 02:49:40 pm
Alot of airports are spelled "aipor"  :shock:
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: dktc on September 03, 2007, 03:05:39 pm
Quote from: "Jps"
Alot of airports are spelled "aipor"  :shock:


That is not me :D
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: StephenM on September 03, 2007, 03:09:08 pm
Quote from: "Jps"
Alot of airports are spelled "aipor"  :shock:


Thats due to the way the databases are setup, only a certain number of charcaters were allowed. However this was expanded.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: DHC on September 04, 2007, 05:47:19 am
ACC the game data show the capacity is 2002 data. Wikipedia show that the is Capacity was 806,365 in 2004.

IPC the more accurate data is 68,689 in 2004 at http://www.azworldairports.com/index.htm
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: dktc on September 26, 2007, 03:38:36 pm
IAD Washington [Washington Dulles Intl], DC, US
DCA Washington [Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport], DC, US

are both called "Washington DC" in-game :roll: That is kind of confusing to say the least
 :wink:
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: AzZellon on October 07, 2007, 07:50:10 pm
Just to note that KWI - Kuwait International Airport, in the game that is, has an innacurate PAX rate of '3,992,560', that data is accurate for the year 1999 actually. January - July 2007 statistics claim that 4,000,000 passenger's passed through the airport in 7 month's, so assuming there are 5 left which are August, September, October, November and December, I'm assuming that August and December will present A LOT of passenger's.. Just to be on safe side I assume there will be another 3 million passenger's in these 5 month's, bringing a total of around 7million passenger's yearly. My data is being presented by the KWI airport statistic's :-

http://www.kuwait-airport.com.kw/Index_e.htm

I hope you can change the data from 4mill to 7 mill please.

Thanks!
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Jps on October 08, 2007, 11:25:45 am
No wonder it seemed so low...(compared to the other Middle East airports)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: AzZellon on October 08, 2007, 05:15:48 pm
Can a admin/mod please give their thoughts on whether this will change or not before the next round ?

Thanks.  :)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: StephenM on October 08, 2007, 05:23:13 pm
Just a technicality, there are no longer Moderators that are not admins. And secondly any moderators would be external to the game.

Anyway, its airport data so Rick will take care of it.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on October 08, 2007, 05:53:19 pm
Sorry it took a little longer, I was adding Central America airports yesterday and working on college application essays so I didn't check thsi thread after the morning. All better now!

Also, every continent but the Middle East now has over 100 airports! :)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: AzZellon on October 08, 2007, 07:30:25 pm
Thank's for the update Rick! Much better performance and already the $$$ are on the increase...  :twisted:

Ahem, ofcourse we have to be as accurate as possible.  :wink:
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: zvezdaman on October 08, 2007, 09:24:17 pm
I added 4 airports to the database in the past two days :D
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: iranair777 on October 11, 2007, 02:47:04 pm
I belive that 'Tehran - Mehrabad/Qualeh Morge' should be changed to 'Tehran Mehrabad International Airport' because Qualeh Morge is another airport in the city which is used by the military
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: dktc on October 12, 2007, 12:27:18 am
Quote from: "PT-SSK"
And please, some corrections in these airports names in Brazil:

ATM - Altamira instead Aeroporto de Altamira
MAB - Marabá instead Aeroporto de Maraba
UBA - Uberaba instead Aeroporto de Uberaba
BVB - Boa Vista instead Aeroporto Internacional de Boa
CCM - Criciúma - Foquilhinha insteadForquilinha - Criciuma
IGU - Foz do Iguassu instead Iguazu Falls

Please, correct the information about passangers by year:

IOS - Ilheus: 120,000 instead 1,200,000
CFB - Cabo Frio: 350,000 instead 3,500,000

These airports are real smaller than in Airline Mogul, let's let more real!
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on October 12, 2007, 11:47:47 pm
All of the aforementioned mistake have been fixed. Thank you very much for all of your help :)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: CornField on October 13, 2007, 01:31:47 am
SUE->  Door County Cherryland

D-base shows 30,000   FAA shows 0
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: pseudoswede on October 13, 2007, 02:50:28 am
"Karlstadt", Sweden (KSD)

Correct spelling is Karlstad.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: apoivre on October 13, 2007, 05:16:56 am
Quote from: "dktc"
Quote from: "PT-SSK"
And please, some corrections in these airports names in Brazil:

Please, correct the information about passangers by year:

IOS - Ilheus: 120,000 instead 1,200,000


Quote from: "hpscot08"
All of the aforementioned mistake have been fixed. Thank you very much for all of your help :)


Now that IOS is down to a more reasonable number (hey, I leased a gate there at 100K and now it's 50K! Do I get my money back?) you may want to adjust LEC as well. I don't have the traffic figures but according to wikipedia the town's population was 9,590 in 2004 (AM states the airport has 900K pax). Granted it's a major transportation nexus for the sertão - but not by so large a margin, definitely...
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: pseudoswede on October 13, 2007, 05:21:09 am
Quote from: "apoivre"
you may want to adjust LEC as well. I don't have the traffic figures but according to wikipedia the town's population was 9,590 in 2004 (AM states the airport has 900K pax). Granted it's a major transportation nexus for the sertão - but not by so large a margin, definitely...


This pdf (http://www.sct.ba.gov.br/opinv/InvestorInformation.pdf) says 2004 traffic was at 5,323.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on October 14, 2007, 06:02:07 am
All of the above should be fixed!

Also, all of the South American airport's IATA codes have been added, just so y'all know I actually do do work! ;)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Jps on October 14, 2007, 06:07:24 am
Quote from: "hpscot08"
All of the above should be fixed!

Also, all of the South American airport's IATA codes have been added, just so y'all know I actually do do work! ;)


^.. Thanks for putting in the codes
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: Air Elbonia on October 14, 2007, 05:07:25 pm
I believe he means icao.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: hpscot08 on October 14, 2007, 08:00:14 pm
Yeah my bad, I was kind of tired and brain dead after so many airports...
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: digifreak on October 15, 2007, 12:54:20 am
Well... Regarding Portugal I see the following errors:

OPO is listed as: Oporto International (Carneiro
The real name is Aeroporto Internacional Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro (maybe you could just remove the "(carneiro" and leave only Oporto International)
(you can check here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Sá_Carneiro_Airport)

PDL is listed as Ponta Delgada, Azores
The real name is João Paulo II Airport or just Ponta Delgada
(again http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/João_Paulo_II_Airport)

TER is listed as Terceira
The name is Lajes (or Air Base No. 4)
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lajes_Field and http://worldaerodata.com/wad.cgi?id=PO05955&sch=lpla )

And well... there are some smaller airports here in Portugal (Brangança, Vila Real, Cascais and Evora... do you want their data?)
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: dktc on October 15, 2007, 03:31:09 am
Further discussion of those Portugese airports have been splitted to these topic:
http://stephenm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2449
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: blastpast on October 15, 2007, 06:02:46 am
i wasnt sure where to post this. i didnt want to make a new topic for it. but right now when you research a route, there is no separation between the two washington DC's in the US. There's Washington DC ad Washington DC. if the code could be put after the DC such as Washington DC - ABC (can't think of the codes right now), it'd be very helpful.
Title: Airport database inaccuracies
Post by: zvezdaman on October 15, 2007, 10:57:01 pm
Updates:

-Beijing Capital Airport carried 48,501,102 passengers in 2006....8 million more than it says on AM data.

-Prague Ruzyně Airport carried 11,581,511 passengers in 2006 rather than 10.7 milion.

-Athens Intl carried 15,079,662 passengers in 2006 over 14.3 million.


Just a suggestion, I think there should be a feature that allows players to help update airport data by being able to resubmit the same airport except with the new data. For example, I would submit Beijing Capital even though AM already has it. But i would change it to the updated pax info for 2006 and show sources and turn it in. what do yall think?