Airline Mogul Forum
Airline Mogul => Bugs => Topic started by: Chavaquiah on May 07, 2008, 02:16:15 pm
-
I don't know if it was just me but my airline (ID 8585), in Public Word #3, does not have any financial movements for the 1st of September. Yet cash and airline value went down.
(http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/5886/image1id6.jpg)
In the Operations Dept there are no entries for this month.
-
I may know the reason for this, however I cannot investigate fully until later this evening.
-
same here :) damn i have no projected maintenence, gate, expenses...COOL!! hehe bt those costs have been taken into account....
-
Same problem here. World 4.
-
It also occurred in W6
And affected to my airline value :(
-
Slight technical difficulty folks... please standby while the admins fix the problem.
-
Alright. I believe i found it and fixed it.
There was a missing comma... i hate those small details that mess big things up.
at the moment, the only thing that appeared effected was the record entry process (as you noticed) the cash affect was still working properly.
Stephen introduced (whether he announced it or not) some maintenance staff costs which will be charged on a monthly basis IIRC. they're not too huge, but they're denoted separately in the cash flow logs. Small bug in there, as i said, messed up the recordkeeping.
-
but i prefer there is no expenses every month , only revenue :lol:
-
but i prefer there is no expenses every month , only revenue :lol:
Don't we all :twisted:
-
Costs still show zero on my income statement.....
-
It's also happening to me! Suddenly my operating costs dropped more than 75% :shock:
-
It should ahve happened to everyone. As Will said it was a comma that caused the issue, just love those little things. :(
As a result of this change, there is a new maintenace cost for staff. There will be new statistics to log the airframe hours and cycles on the aircraft added soon. They will help with future maintenance changes.
-
:P :P :P :P :P :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Then, do I have to pay for the costs that haven't show up this month?
-
Hopefully not, and hopefully the charges are less then they have been.
-
Hopefully not, and hopefully the charges are less then they have been.
There are additional costs now. Nothing too big, but its a start.
-
I knew there was an explaination for this when i checked my finances page about 2-3 mins ago
-
There are additional costs now. Nothing too big, but its a start.
My maintenance bill went from 2.97 bn to 5.26 bn! Nothing too big, you say?! :evil:
You'll make easyJets of us all! :cry:
OK, I was one who asked for increased costs. Silly me. Can't complaint now.
-
:evil: :evil: :evil: (wwith my nose bleeding)
WTF!!! The maintianence cost are soooo high (78% of the overall cost):cry: :cry: :cry:
My airline is going to bankrupt soon if it continues....
-
:evil: :evil: :evil: (wwith my nose bleeding)
WTF!!! The maintianence cost are soooo high (78% of the overall cost):cry: :cry: :cry:
My airline is going to bankrupt soon if it continues....
Mine when up as well. I am near 3bil a day in mait. costs... This brings up another question. With over 1.5 bil of leased planes out, why did I not get paid for them last month and why do I pay maitnence on them?
Shouldn't the leaser pay?
-
With over 1.5 bil of leased planes out, why did I not get paid for them last month and why do I pay maitnence on them?
Shouldn't the leaser pay?
You did get paid. It's just that the revenue was not logged. But both your cash and your airline value should reflect your leasing revenue.
And why does the leaser pay maintenance? Well, damp leasing (http://www.stephenm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6525) contracts, that's why.
-
So I see they've added engineering and tech services salaries....does that mean there's an advantage to having a more uniform fleet, as you don't need to hire as many engineers?
Mine's at 68%.
-
As you should all see, the Salaries are quite low. When I was putting the concept together, it was felt that the ratio of staff per plane was too high, so it was lowered. The way it is calculated is the fleet /3. That means that for each individual aircraft type, unless it was divisible by 3 it would have an effect, but only a few thousand a month. In the second maintenance change, common fleets and scrapping should make a bigger difference with lower costs for new parts, and scrapped planes could also be used for parts (As they are supposed to be)
-
As you should all see, the Salaries are quite low. When I was putting the concept together, it was felt that the ratio of staff per plane was too high, so it was lowered. The way it is calculated is the fleet /3. That means that for each individual aircraft type, unless it was divisible by 3 it would have an effect, but only a few thousand a month. In the second maintenance change, common fleets and scrapping should make a bigger difference with lower costs for new parts, and scrapped planes could also be used for parts (As they are supposed to be)
So a standardized fleet will have benefit in game like there is in real life (southwest)?
-
Thats the way it should be, but the concept for the second stage of maintenance needs to be developed further. Its very much a set of loose ideas.